Business Process Modeling: Perceived Benefits

被引:0
作者
Indulska, Marta [1 ]
Green, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Recker, Jan [2 ]
Rosemann, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Business, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Informat Syst Prog, Brisbane 4000, Australia
来源
CONCEPTUAL MODELING - ER 2009, PROCEEDINGS | 2009年 / 5829卷
关键词
Business process modeling; benefits; modeling advantages; Delphi study; DELPHI TECHNIQUE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The process-centered design of organizations and information systems is globally seen as an appropriate response to the increased economic pressure on organizations. At the methodological core of process-centered management is process modeling. However, business process modeling in large initiatives can be a time-consuming and costly exercise, making it potentially difficult to convince executive management of its benefits. To date, and despite substantial interest and research in the area of process modeling, the understanding of the actual benefits of process modeling in academia and practice is limited. To address this gap, this paper explores the perception of benefits derived from process modeling initiatives, as reported through a global Delphi study. The study incorporates the views of three groups of stakeholders academics, practitioners and vendors. Our findings lead to the first identification and ranking of 19 unique benefits associated with process modeling. The study in particular found that process modeling benefits vary significantly between practitioners and academics. We argue that the variations may point to a disconnect between research projects and practical demands.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TANGIBLE BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING: A NEW APPROACH
    Edelman, Jonathan
    Grosskopf, Alexander
    Weske, Mathias
    Leifer, Larry
    ICED 09 - THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, VOL 6: DESIGN METHODS AND TOOLS, PT 2, 2009, : 485 - +
  • [42] METHODOLOGICAL EXTENSIONS FOR SEMANTIC BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING
    de Francisco, David
    Munoz, Henar
    Perez, Noelia
    Martinez, Javier
    Markovic, Ivan
    ICEIS 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, VOL ISAS-2: INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND SPECIFICATION, VOL 2, 2008, : 410 - +
  • [43] A Meta-modeling Framework to Support Accountability in Business Process Modeling
    Zou, Joe
    De Vaney, Christopher
    Wang, Yan
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS: MODELING, DEVELOPMENT, AND INTEGRATION: THIRD INTERNATIONAL UNITED INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, UNISCON 2009, 2009, 20 : 539 - 550
  • [44] Categories of Business Value of Robotic Process Automation: A Study of Benefits and Challenges
    Vitzethum, Maximilian
    Mayr, Alexander
    Janiesch, Christian
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT, BPM 2024, 2024, 14940 : 421 - 438
  • [45] Practitioners View on Domain Specific Business Process Modeling
    Bicevskis, Janis
    Cerina-Berzina, Jana
    Karnitis, Girts
    Lace, Lelde
    Medvedis, Inga
    Nesterovs, Sergejs
    DATABASES AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS VI: SELECTED PAPERS FROM THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL BALTIC CONFERENCE (DB&IS 2010), 2011, 224 : 169 - 182
  • [46] Overcoming expressiveness deficit of business process modeling languages
    Fiodorov, Igor G.
    BIZNES INFORMATIKA-BUSINESS INFORMATICS, 2016, 37 (03): : 62 - 71
  • [47] Business Process Modeling Patterns for Blockchain Application Development
    Alzhrani, Fouzia
    Saeedi, Kawther
    Zhao, Liping
    IEEE ACCESS, 2025, 13 : 20691 - 20712
  • [48] A Primer to Subject-Oriented Business Process Modeling
    Fleischmann, Albert
    Schmidt, Werner
    Stary, Christian
    S-BPM ONE - SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 2012, 104 : 218 - +
  • [49] Multi-abstraction layered business process modeling
    Van Nuffel, Dieter
    De Backer, Manu
    COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2012, 63 (02) : 131 - 147
  • [50] Integrated business process modeling, analysis and supporting tools
    Mertins, K
    Jochem, R
    Jakel, FW
    MODELLING TECHNIQUES FOR BUSINESS PROCESS RE-ENGINEERING AND BENCHMARKING, 1997, : 61 - 70