Validation of power measurement techniques in dynamic lower body resistance exercises

被引:185
作者
Cormie, Prue [1 ]
McBride, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
McCaulley, Grant O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Appalachian State Univ, Neuromuscular Lab, Dept Hlth, Boone, NC 28608 USA
关键词
optimal load; force; velocity; jump squat; power clean;
D O I
10.1123/jab.23.2.103
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to investigate the validity of power measurement techniques utilizing various kinematic and kinetic devices during the jump squat (JS), squat (S) and power clean (PC). Ten Division I male athletes were assessed for power output across various intensities: 0, 12, 27, 42, 56, 71, and 85% of one repetition maximum strength (IRM) in the JS and S and 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90% of 1RM in the PC. During the execution of each lift, six different data collection systems were utilized; (1) one linear position transducer (1-LPT); (2) one linear position transducer with the system mass representing the force (1-LPT+MASS); (3) two linear position transducers (2-LPT); (4) the force plate (FP); (5) one linear position transducer and a force plate (I-LPT+FP); (6) two linear position transducers and a force place (2-LPT+FP). Kinetic and kinematic variables calculated using the six methodologies were compared. Vertical power, force, and velocity differed significantly between 2-LPT+FP and 1-LPT, 1-LPT+MASS, 2-LPT, and FP methodologies across various intensities throughout the JS, S, and PC. These differences affected the load-power relationship and resulted in the transfer of the optimal load to a number of different intensities. This examination clearly indicates that data collection and analysis procedures influence the power output calculated as well as the load-power relationship of dynamic lower body movements.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 118
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Alemany JA, 2005, J STRENGTH COND RES, V19, P33
  • [2] Baker D, 1999, J STRENGTH COND RES, V13, P230
  • [3] Baker D, 2001, J STRENGTH COND RES, V15, P92
  • [4] BAUMGARTNER TA, 2001, MEASUREMENT PHYS ED, V15, P92
  • [5] INTENDED RATHER THAN ACTUAL MOVEMENT VELOCITY DETERMINES VELOCITY-SPECIFIC TRAINING RESPONSE
    BEHM, DG
    SALE, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 74 (01) : 359 - 368
  • [6] A DYNAMOMETER FOR EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC MUSCLE WORK
    BOSCO, C
    BELLI, A
    ASTRUA, M
    TIHANYI, J
    POZZO, R
    KELLIS, S
    TSARPELA, O
    FOTI, C
    MANNO, R
    TRANQUILLI, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 70 (05): : 379 - 386
  • [7] BOURQUE S, 2003, DETERMINANTS LOAD PE
  • [8] Measurement of resistance exercise force expression
    Chiu, LZF
    Schilling, BK
    Fry, AC
    Weiss, LW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 20 (02) : 204 - 212
  • [9] Coelho CW, 2003, J STRENGTH COND RES, V17, P334
  • [10] Muscle power increases after resistance training in growth-hormone-deficient adults
    Coelho, CW
    Velloso, CR
    Brasil, RRDO
    Vaisman, M
    De Araújo, CGS
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2002, 34 (10) : 1577 - 1581