High Frequency (10 kHz) or Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients With Predominant Back Pain: Preliminary Data From a Prospective Observational Study

被引:48
作者
Kinfe, Thomas M. [1 ,2 ]
Pintea, Bogdan [1 ]
Link, Carolina [3 ]
Roeske, Sandra [4 ,5 ]
Gueresir, Erdem [1 ]
Gueresir, Agi [1 ]
Vatter, Hartmut [1 ]
机构
[1] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Bonn, Germany
[2] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Div Funct Neurosurg & Neuromodulat, Bonn, Germany
[3] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Bonn, Germany
[4] German Ctr Neurodegenerat Dis, DZNE, Bonn, Germany
[5] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Hosp, Bonn, Germany
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2016年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
Back pain; burst stimulation; failed back surgery syndrome; high frequency stimulation; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; ECONOMIC BURDEN; FOLLOW-UP; MECHANISMS; SYSTEM; THERAPY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/ner.12379
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) exhibits pain relief and improved quality of life in refractory failed back surgery syndrome. However, patients suffering from predominant back pain failed to achieve a favorable neuromodulation outcome. Currently, two new stimulation concepts, the burst and the HF10 stimulation paradigms successfully suppress intractable back pain levels in this difficult-to-treat subgroup. To date, literature data comparing both stimulation patterns is lacking. Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted including 16 refractory Failed-back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients with previous spine surgery and predominant back pain (70% of overall pain) with or without leg pain eligible for burst or high-frequency SCS. At baseline and at a three-month follow-up the pain intensity (back pain (VAS(B))/leg pain (VAS(L)), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), changes in severity of depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]) and any adverse event related to the implantation and the stimulation were recorded. Results: Overall baseline VAS(B) was significantly suppressed in 14 FBSS patients (eight burst/six patients with 10 HF10) from baseline 7.9 +/- 0.7 to 2.3 +/- 1 (p<0.001), while the overall VAS(L) declined significantly from 3.1 +/- 1.5 to 1.9 +/- 0.83 (p<0.01). The burst patients experienced significant VAS(L) reduction (burst 1.8 +/- 0.7 (p<0.009) compared to HF10 patients 2.2 +/- 1). Two patients failed 10 HF10-trial. The BDI [23.3 +/- 2.1 to 13.5 +/- 4.5 (p<0.001)] and the PSQI [7.6 +/- 3.7 to 4.2 +/- 1.4 (p<0.003)] dropped down significantly for both modalities. No implantation/stimulation-related complications were observed. Conclusions: Burst and HF10 SCS performed efficiently and safely in intractable FBSS patients with predominant back pain and deserve more refined, specific investigations to determine their efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 274
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] ELECTRICAL CONDUCTION BLOCK IN LARGE NERVES: HIGH-FREQUENCY CURRENT DELIVERY IN THE NONHUMAN PRIMATE
    Ackermann, D. Michael, Jr.
    Ethier, Christian
    Foldes, Emily L.
    Oby, Emily R.
    Tyler, Dustin
    Bauman, Matt
    Bhadra, Niloy
    Miller, Lee
    Kilgore, Kevin L.
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2011, 43 (06) : 897 - 899
  • [2] Sustained Effectiveness of 10 kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients with Chronic, Low Back Pain: 24-Month Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study
    Al-Kaisy, Adnan
    Van Buyten, Jean-Pierre
    Smet, Iris
    Palmisani, Stefano
    Pang, David
    Smith, Thomas
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (03) : 347 - 354
  • [3] Prevalence of sleep disturbance in patients with low back pain
    Alsaadi, Saad M.
    McAuley, James H.
    Hush, Julia M.
    Maher, Chris G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (05) : 737 - 743
  • [4] Annemans Lieven, 2014, J Long Term Eff Med Implants, V24, P173
  • [5] Buyten J P., 2010, EUR J PAIN S, V4, P273, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.EUJPS.2010.09.006, 10.1016/j.eujps.2010.09.006]
  • [6] Pretreatment Psychosocial Variables as Predictors of Outcomes Following Lumbar Surgery and Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Literature Synthesis
    Celestin, James
    Edwards, Robert R.
    Jamison, Robert N.
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2009, 10 (04) : 639 - 653
  • [7] Improved Pain Relief With Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Two Weeks in Patients Using Tonic Stimulation: Results From a Small Clinical Study
    Courtney, Peter
    Espinet, Anthony
    Mitchell, Bruce
    Russo, Marc
    Muir, Andrew
    Verrills, Paul
    Davis, Kristina
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (05): : 361 - 366
  • [8] Effect of High-Frequency Alternating Current on Spinal Afferent Nociceptive Transmission
    Cuellar, Jason M.
    Alataris, Konstantinos
    Walker, Andre
    Yeomans, David C.
    Antognini, Joseph F.
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2013, 16 (04): : 318 - 327
  • [9] A 2-center Comparative Study on Tonic Versus Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation Amount of Responders and Amount of Pain Suppression
    De Ridder, Dirk
    Lenders, Mathieu W. P. M.
    De Vos, Cecile C.
    Dijkstra-Scholten, Cindy
    Wolters, Rian
    Vancamp, Tim
    Van Looy, Pieter
    Van Havenbergh, Tony
    Vanneste, Sven
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 31 (05) : 433 - 437
  • [10] Is Preoperative Pain Duration Important in Spinal Cord Stimulation? A Comparison Between Tonic and Burst Stimulation
    De Ridder, Dirk
    Vancamp, Tim
    Lenders, Mathieu W. P. M.
    De Vos, Cecile C.
    Vanneste, Sven
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (01): : 13 - 17