Life cycle assessment and exergoeconomic analysis of the multi-generation system based on fuel cell for methanol, power, and heat production

被引:72
|
作者
Mehrpooya, Mehdi [1 ]
Ansarinasab, Hojat [2 ]
Mousavi, Seyed Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] ITMO Univ, Sch Biotechnol & Cryogen Syst, Fac Cryogen Engn, St Petersburg, Russia
[2] Petr Univ Technol PUT, Fac Energy Syst Engn, Abadan, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran, Fac New Sci & Technol, Dept Renewable Energies & Environm, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Multi-generation system; Methanol synthesis; Fuel cell; Techno-economic analysis; Life cycle assessment; EXERGOENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; EXERGY ANALYSIS; PLANT; HYDROGEN; ENERGY; GASIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.111
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main purpose of present investigation is to evaluate a multi-generation process by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and exergoeconomic analysis methods. This integrated system is composed of Methanol Synthesis Process, Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC), and Combined Heat and Power system. This exergy - based evaluation is comprised of three items: (1) exergy evaluation to assess the efficiency and performance of the multi-generation system, (2) exergoeconomic evaluation to express a relationship between overall costs and the performance of the hybrid system, (3) exergoenvironmental evaluation to present useful information about the mutual impact of the process's performance and environmental conditions. By applying the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses, The process simulation and exergetic evaluation are conducted by the Aspen HYSYS V 11 and MATLAB software, respectively. This configuration provides 271.7 kgmole/h pure methanol, 110,544 kW net power, and 65398.7 kgmole/h hot water (at 80 degrees C). The total exergy efficiency and destroyed exergy rate of this multi-generation configuration are obtained to be 58.4% and 128549 kW, respectively. About 41.28% of the total exergy destruction rate occurred in the MCFC. The results of exergoeconomic assessment illustrate that the highest overall cost is associated with MCFC (4836.87 $/h). In addition, the burner has the least value of exergoeconomic factor (1.47%). So, to improve the cost-effectivity of the system, the burner should be re-designed. According to the exergoenvironmental analysis, the greatest values of overall environmental impacts belonged to MCFC (4033.13 Pt/h) and burner (1501.99 Pt/h), respectively. Accordingly, to decline the negative environmental impacts of the system, the operating conditions of selected devices must be modified. Finally, the 3D sensitivity analyses for four main devices are implemented. By using this sensitivity evaluation, the thermodynamic parameters that need to be optimized are specified. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1314 / 1332
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of domestic fuel cell micro combined heat and power generation: Exploring influential factors
    Bachmann, Till M.
    Carnicelli, Federica
    Preiss, Philipp
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (07) : 3891 - 3905
  • [22] Thermodynamic analysis of a solar-based multi-generation system with hydrogen production
    Ozturk, Murat
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 51 (1-2) : 1235 - 1244
  • [23] Life cycle assessment of a small-scale methanol production system: A Power-to-Fuel strategy for biogas plants
    Eggemann, Lea
    Escobar, Neus
    Peters, Ralf
    Burauel, Peter
    Stolten, Detlef
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271
  • [24] Parametric study and optimization analysis of a multi-generation system using waste heat in natural gas refinery- an energy and exergoeconomic analysis
    Ghavami, Morteza
    Gholizadeh, Mohammad
    Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi
    ENERGY, 2023, 272
  • [25] Environmental impact analysis of biomass power generation system based on life cycle assessment
    Lin, Lin
    Zhao, Daiqing
    Li, Li
    Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2008, 29 (05): : 618 - 623
  • [26] Exergoeconomic analysis of a solar-powered/fuel assisted Rankine cycle for power generation
    Cavalcanti, Eduardo J. C.
    Motta, Henrique Pereira
    ENERGY, 2015, 88 : 555 - 562
  • [27] Environmental Impact Assessment of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Power Generation System Based on Life Cycle Assessment-A Case Study in China
    Shen, Yilin
    Yang, Yantao
    Song, Lei
    Lei, Tingzhou
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of fuel selection for power generation, in Taiwan
    Yang, Ying-Hsien
    Lin, Sue-Jane
    Lewis, Charles
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2007, 57 (11) : 1387 - 1395
  • [29] Exergetic life cycle assessment of cement production process with waste heat power generation
    Sui, Xiuwen
    Zhang, Yun
    Shao, Shuai
    Zhang, Shushen
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 88 : 684 - 692
  • [30] Life cycle assessment of molten carbonate fuel cell system for power plants
    Kim, Hyoung-Seok
    Kim, Dong-Hyeon
    Hur, Tak
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 302