Return of individual results in epilepsy genomic research: A view from the field

被引:7
作者
Ottman, Ruth [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Freyer, Catharine [5 ]
Mefford, Heather C. [6 ]
Poduri, Annapurna [7 ,8 ]
Lowenstein, Daniel H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Neurol, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, GH Sergievsky Ctr, 630 W 168th St,P&S Box 16, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Div Translat Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Pediat, Div Med Genet, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Epilepsy & Clin Neurophysiol, Dept Neurol, Epilepsy Genet Program, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
epileptic encephalopathy; genetics; pathogenic variants; research ethics; SELF-GUIDED MANAGEMENT; DE-NOVO MUTATIONS; RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; INFORMED-CONSENT; PUBLIC EXPECTATIONS; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; GENETIC RESEARCH; PREFERENCES; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1111/epi.14530
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Genomic findings are emerging rapidly in 2 large, closely related epilepsy research consortia: the Epilepsy Phenome/Genome Project and Epi4K. Disclosure of individual results to participants in genomic research is increasingly viewed as an ethical obligation, but strategies for return of results were not included in the design of these consortia, raising complexities in establishing criteria for which results to offer, determining participant preferences, managing the large number of sites involved, and covering associated costs. Here, we describe the challenges faced, alternative approaches considered, and progress to date. Experience from these 2 consortia illustrates the importance, for genomic research in epilepsy and other disorders, of including a specific plan for return of results in the study design, with financial support for obtaining clinical confirmation and providing ongoing support for participants. Participant preferences for return of results should be established at the time of enrollment, and methods for allowing future contacts with participants should be included. In addition, methods should be developed for summarizing meaningful, comprehensible information about findings in the aggregate that participants can access in an ongoing way.
引用
收藏
页码:1635 / 1642
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [21] The Challenge of Informed Consent and Return of Results in Translational Genomics: Empirical Analysis and Recommendations
    Henderson, Gail E.
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Kuczynski, Kristine J.
    Joffe, Steven
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Parsons, D. Williams
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    Yu, Joon-Ho
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2014, 42 (03) : 344 - 355
  • [22] Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    Savage, Sarah K.
    Green, Robert C.
    Juengst, Eric
    McGuire, Amy
    Kornetsky, Susan
    Brewster, Stephanie J.
    Joffe, Steven
    Taylor, Patrick
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 16 (07) : 547 - 552
  • [23] Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices In Between
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Amendola, Laura M.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Brothers, Kyle
    Clayton, Ellen W.
    Chung, Wendy
    Evans, Barbara J.
    Evans, James P.
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Gallego, Carlos J.
    Garrison, Nanibaa' A.
    Gray, Stacy W.
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    Kullo, Iftikhar J.
    Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani
    McCarty, Cathy
    Prows, Cynthia A.
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Salama, Joseph
    Sanderson, Saskia
    Van Driest, Sara L.
    Williams, Marc S.
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Wolf, Wendy A.
    Burke, Wylie
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2014, 94 (06) : 818 - 826
  • [24] Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
    Kalia, Sarah S.
    Adelman, Kathy
    Bale, Sherri J.
    Chung, Wendy K.
    Eng, Christine
    Evans, James P.
    Herman, Gail E.
    Hufnagel, Sophia B.
    Klein, Teri E.
    Korf, Bruce R.
    McKelvey, Kent D.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Richards, C. Sue
    Vlangos, Christopher N.
    Watson, Michael
    Martin, Christa L.
    Miller, David T.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 19 (02) : 249 - 255
  • [25] The Epilepsy Phenome/Genome Project
    Karn, Catharine Freyer
    McGovern, Kathleen
    Stillman, Nora
    McKenna, Kevin
    Mays, Vickie
    Williams, Michael
    Carpenter, Alan
    Miller, Kevin
    Agarwal, Prashant
    Ayala, Jennifer
    Bakey, Cate
    Borkowski, Thomas
    Boyd, Riann
    Camuto, Alicia
    Carrasco, Cendy
    Cassarly, Jennifer
    Collins, Yong
    Collon, Kevin
    Collon, Sean
    Eckman, Heather
    Fogarty, Susan
    Gonzalez Moron, Dolores
    Grayson, La June
    Hagopian, Samantha
    Hayden, Emily
    Heggeli, Kristin
    Hennessy, Rachel
    Hessling, Jody
    Hirschfield, Emily
    Howell, Jennifer
    Klingerman, Sherry
    Lopez, Maritza
    Marinelli, Heather
    Maschhaupt, Brandy
    Minnick, Jennie
    Misajon, Jade
    Monahan, Jennifer
    Oliver, Karen
    Parulkar, Isha
    Przepiorka, Laura
    Pyzik, Paula
    Regan, Brigid
    Shain, Catherine
    Slingerland, Lexie
    Stanton, Caitlin
    Taylor, Kelly
    Thompson, Stacy
    Turczyk, Jennifer
    Vara, Alexander
    Wesolowski, Cindy
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2013, 10 (04) : 568 - 586
  • [26] Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study
    Kaufman, David
    Murphy, Juli
    Scott, Joan
    Hudson, Kathy
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 10 (11) : 331 - 339
  • [27] Processes and factors involved in decisions regarding return of incidental genomic findings in research
    Klitzman, Robert
    Buquez, Brigitte
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    Fyer, Abby
    Chung, Wendy K.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 16 (04) : 311 - 317
  • [28] Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings
    Klitzman, Robert
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    Fyer, Abby
    Martinez, Josue
    Buquez, Brigitte
    Wynn, Julia
    Waldman, Cameron R.
    Phelan, Jo
    Parens, Erik
    Chung, Wendy K.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (11) : 888 - 895
  • [29] Return of genetic testing results in the era of whole-genome sequencing
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    Zawati, Ma'n H.
    Senecal, Karine
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2015, 16 (09) : 553 - 559
  • [30] Multidimensional Results Reporting to Participants in Genomic Studies: Getting It Right
    Kohane, Isaac S.
    Taylor, Patrick L.
    [J]. SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (37)