The growth paradox, sustainable development, and business strategy

被引:49
作者
Edwards, Mark G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jonkoping Univ, Jonkoping Int Business Sch, Media Management & Transformat Ctr, Jonkoping, Sweden
关键词
business strategy; degrowth; growth paradox; growth typology; metatheoretical research; social– ecological system; sustainability; transformation; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; MODEL; DEGROWTH; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; TRANSITION; KNOWLEDGE; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2790
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Economic growth is a two-edged sword. Expanding economies and industries create wealth and employment, but global economic expansion is having unprecedented deleterious impacts on vital planetary systems. Despite this, the core strategic goal of all economies and many businesses continues to be the pursuit of ongoing economic growth. To resolve this paradox, a reconceptualization of firm-level growth is presented. I describe and discuss the organizational characteristics of the growth paradox and follow this with a metatheoretical review of economic, organizational, and ecological perspectives on growth. From this review, a typology of firm-level strategy is developed that radically reconceptualizes business growth as developmental activity primarily concerned with social-ecological flourishing. The features of this typology and its implications for business strategy are discussed according to three principles that emerged from the analysis: multidexterity, resilience thinking for design, and inclusive balance (embeddedness). Together, these strategy principles form the prerequisite management competencies needed for the development, implementation, and evaluation of sustainable business strategies. Transformative firm-level responses to the growth paradox are needed if sustaining forms of organizational growth are to be achieved and this paper presents a novel integrative framework for informing those strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:3079 / 3094
页数:16
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   "Business Growth"-Do Practitioners and Scholars Really Talk About the Same Thing? [J].
Achtenhagen, Leona ;
Naldi, Lucia ;
Melin, Leif .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2010, 34 (02) :289-316
[2]   Innovation and Growth: How Business Contributes to Society [J].
Ahlstrom, David .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 24 (03) :11-24
[3]   Frugal Abundance in an Age of Limits: Envisioning a Degrowth Economy [J].
Alexander, Samuel .
TRANSITIONING TO A POST-CARBON SOCIETY: DEGROWTH, AUSTERITY AND WELLBEING, 2017, :159-179
[4]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[5]  
Antonios A., 2010, BUSINESS EC J, V1, P1
[6]   The Interplay of Well-being and Resilience in Applying a Social-Ecological Perspective [J].
Armitage, Derek ;
Bene, Chris ;
Charles, Anthony T. ;
Johnson, Derek ;
Allison, Edward H. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (04)
[7]   Theoretical perspectives on organizations and organizing in a post-growth era [J].
Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby ;
Jermier, John M. ;
Peredo, Ana Maria ;
Perey, Robert ;
Reichel, Andre .
ORGANIZATION, 2021, 28 (03) :337-357
[8]   Long-Term Ecological Impacts from Oil Spills: Comparison of Exxon Valdez, Hebei Spirit, and Deepwater Horizon [J].
Barron, Mace G. ;
Vivian, Deborah N. ;
Heintz, Ron A. ;
Yim, Un Hyuk .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (11) :6456-6467
[9]  
Bartunek J.M., 1988, Paradox and transformation, P137
[10]  
Bartunek JM, 2017, RES ORGAN CHAN DEV, V25, P143, DOI 10.1108/S0897-301620170000025004