Kinetic model discrimination on the biogas production in thermophilic co-digestion of sugarcane vinasse and water hyacinth

被引:5
作者
Chai, Audrey [1 ]
Wong, Yee-Shian [1 ,2 ]
Ong, Soon-An [1 ,2 ]
Lutpi, Nabilah Aminah [1 ,2 ]
Sam, Sung-Ting [3 ]
Kee, Wei-Chin [1 ]
Eng, Kim-Mun [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Fac Civil Engn Technol, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Ctr Excellence WAREG, Water Res & Environm Sustainabil Growth, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
[3] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Fac Chem Engn Technol, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
[4] Kenep Resources Asia Sdn Bhd, Taman Perind Ringan Jelapang Maju, Ipoh 30020, Perak, Malaysia
关键词
Akaike criterion information (AIC); Aquatic waste; Biological wastewater treatment; Distillery wastewater; Industrial effluent; Kinetic study; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; INOCULUM/SUBSTRATE RATIO; METHANE PRODUCTION; MANURE; WASTE; DAIRY; PRETREATMENT; STILLAGE; SLUDGE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-20251-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Co-digestion between sugarcane vinasse (Vn) and water hyacinth (WH) at various mixing ratios of 0:1, 1:0, 1:3, 3:1, and 1:1 was carried out under thermophilic conditions (55 degrees C) for 60 days. The effect of various mixing ratios on the pH changes, soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD) reduction, and cumulative biogas production was investigated. The first order, modified Gompertz, and logistic function kinetic models were selected to fit the experimental data. Model discrimination was conducted through the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The study revealed that co-digestion shows better performance compared to the mono-digestion of both substrates. Vn:WH mixing ratio 1:1 with inoculum to substrate ratio (ISR) of 0.38 g VSinoculum/g VSsubstrate is the most favorable ratio, achieving sCOD reduction efficiency and cumulative biogas production of 71.6% and 1229 mL, respectively. Model selection through AIC revealed that ratio 1:1 was best fitted to the logistic function kinetic model (R-2 = 0.9897) with Y-m and K values of 1232 mL and 31 mL/day, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:61298 / 61306
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Biohydrogen production from co-digestion of sugarcane vinasse and bagasse using anaerobic dark fermentation [J].
Rashidi, Majid ;
Alavi, Nadali ;
Amereh, Fatemeh ;
Rafiee, Mohammad ;
Amanidaz, Nazak ;
Partovi, Khashayar ;
Mosanefi, Shole ;
Bakhshoodeh, Reza .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 25
[32]   Kinetic Model of Biogas Production from Co-digestion of Thai Rice Noodle Wastewater (Khanomjeen) with Chicken Manure [J].
Jijai, Sunwanee ;
Siripatana, Chairat .
2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2017, 138 :386-392
[33]   Biogas production and methanogenic archaeal community in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion processes [J].
Yu, D. ;
Kurola, J. M. ;
Lahde, K. ;
Kymalainen, M. ;
Sinkkonen, A. ;
Romantschuk, M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 143 :54-60
[34]   Anaerobic co-digestion of cheese whey and septage: Effect of substrate and inoculum on biogas production [J].
Bella, K. ;
Rao, P. Venkateswara .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 308
[35]   Common Reed and Maize Silage Co-Digestion as a Pathway towards Sustainable Biogas Production [J].
Czubaszek, Robert ;
Wysocka-Czubaszek, Agnieszka ;
Wichtmann, Wendelin ;
Zajac, Grzegorz ;
Banaszuk, Piotr .
ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (02)
[36]   Anaerobic Digestion And Co-Digestion of Oleaginous Microalgae Residues for Biogas Production [J].
Barontini, Federica ;
Biagini, Enrico ;
Dragoni, Federico ;
Corneli, Elisa ;
Ragaglini, Giorgio ;
Bonari, Enrico ;
Tognotti, Leonardo ;
Nicolella, Cristiano .
2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMASS (ICONBM 2016), 2016, 50 :91-96
[37]   Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Vinasse in Sugarcane Biorefinery: A Techno-economic and Environmental Analysis [J].
Longati, Andreza A. ;
Lino, Anderson R. A. ;
Giordano, Roberto C. ;
Furlan, Felipe F. ;
Cruz, Antonio J. G. .
WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2020, 11 (09) :4573-4591
[38]   Acidogenic phase anaerobic digestion of pretreated sugarcane filter cake for co-digestion with biogas effluent to enhance the methane production [J].
Wongarmat, Worapong ;
Sittijunda, Sureewan ;
Mamimin, Chonticha ;
Reungsang, Alissara .
FUEL, 2022, 310
[39]   Techno-economic analysis of reactor types and biogas utilization schemes in thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sugarcane vinasse [J].
Purwanta ;
Bayu, Ardian Indra ;
Mellyanawaty, Melly ;
Budiman, Arief ;
Budhijanto, Wiratni .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 201 :864-875
[40]   Kinetic modeling and optimization of biogas production from food waste and cow manure co-digestion [J].
Mohammadianroshanfekr, Mohammadmahdi ;
Pazoki, Maryam ;
Pejman, Mohamad Bagher ;
Ghasemzadeh, Reza ;
Pazoki, Abolghasem .
RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 24