Kinetic model discrimination on the biogas production in thermophilic co-digestion of sugarcane vinasse and water hyacinth

被引:5
作者
Chai, Audrey [1 ]
Wong, Yee-Shian [1 ,2 ]
Ong, Soon-An [1 ,2 ]
Lutpi, Nabilah Aminah [1 ,2 ]
Sam, Sung-Ting [3 ]
Kee, Wei-Chin [1 ]
Eng, Kim-Mun [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Fac Civil Engn Technol, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Ctr Excellence WAREG, Water Res & Environm Sustainabil Growth, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
[3] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Fac Chem Engn Technol, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
[4] Kenep Resources Asia Sdn Bhd, Taman Perind Ringan Jelapang Maju, Ipoh 30020, Perak, Malaysia
关键词
Akaike criterion information (AIC); Aquatic waste; Biological wastewater treatment; Distillery wastewater; Industrial effluent; Kinetic study; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; INOCULUM/SUBSTRATE RATIO; METHANE PRODUCTION; MANURE; WASTE; DAIRY; PRETREATMENT; STILLAGE; SLUDGE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-20251-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Co-digestion between sugarcane vinasse (Vn) and water hyacinth (WH) at various mixing ratios of 0:1, 1:0, 1:3, 3:1, and 1:1 was carried out under thermophilic conditions (55 degrees C) for 60 days. The effect of various mixing ratios on the pH changes, soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD) reduction, and cumulative biogas production was investigated. The first order, modified Gompertz, and logistic function kinetic models were selected to fit the experimental data. Model discrimination was conducted through the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The study revealed that co-digestion shows better performance compared to the mono-digestion of both substrates. Vn:WH mixing ratio 1:1 with inoculum to substrate ratio (ISR) of 0.38 g VSinoculum/g VSsubstrate is the most favorable ratio, achieving sCOD reduction efficiency and cumulative biogas production of 71.6% and 1229 mL, respectively. Model selection through AIC revealed that ratio 1:1 was best fitted to the logistic function kinetic model (R-2 = 0.9897) with Y-m and K values of 1232 mL and 31 mL/day, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:61298 / 61306
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Biogas from anaerobic co-digestion of chrome and vegetable tannery solid waste mixture: Influence of the tanning agent and thermal pretreatment [J].
Agustini, Caroline Borges ;
Meyer, Michael ;
Da Costa, Marisa ;
Gutterres, Mariliz .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2018, 118 :24-31
[2]  
Ajibola E., 2012, J SUSTAIN DEV ENV PR, V2, P49
[3]   Anaerobic digestion of thin stillage for energy recovery and water reuse in corn-ethanol plants [J].
Alkan-Ozkaynak, A. ;
Karthikeyan, K. G. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (21) :9891-9896
[4]   Inhibitory effect of heavy metals on methane-producing anaerobic granular sludge [J].
Altas, Levent .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2009, 162 (2-3) :1551-1556
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, J CHEM SCI
[6]   Effect of the organic loading rate on the performance and microbial populations during the anaerobic treatment of tequila vinasses in a pilot-scale packed bed reactor [J].
Arreola-Vargas, Jorge ;
Snell-Castro, Raul ;
Rojo-Liera, Nuvia M. ;
Gonzalez-Alvarez, Victor ;
Mendez-Acosta, Hugo O. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 93 (02) :591-599
[7]   Identification of synergistic impacts during anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes [J].
Astals, S. ;
Batstone, D. J. ;
Mata-Alvarez, J. ;
Jensen, P. D. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 169 :421-427
[8]  
Baird R.B., 2017, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, V23rd
[9]  
Barua V. B., 2018, BIORESOUR TECHNOL RE, V4, P202, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.BITEB.2018.11, 10.1016/j.biteb.2018.11.002, DOI 10.1016/J.BITEB.2018.11.002]
[10]   Biogas production from water hyacinth in a novel anaerobic digester: A continuous study [J].
Barua, Visva Bharati ;
Kalamdhad, Ajay S. .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 127 :82-89