An efficient envelope-based Branch and Bound algorithm for non-convex combined heat and power production planning

被引:90
作者
Rong, Aiying [1 ]
Lahdelma, Risto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Informat Technol, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
branch and bound; mixed integer programming; envelope; combined heat and power production; energy optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.072
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Combined heat and power (CHP) production is universally accepted as one of the most energy-efficient technologies to produce energy with lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions. In CHP technology, heat and power generation follow a joint characteristic. Traditional CHP production is usually applied in backpressure plants, where the joint characteristic can often be represented by a convex model. Advanced CHP production technologies such as backpressure plants with condensing and auxiliary cooling options, gas turbines, and combined gas and steam cycles may require non-convex models. Cost-efficient operation of a CHP system can be planned using an optimization model based on forecasts for heat load and power price. A long-term planning model decomposes into thousands of single-period models, which can be formulated in the convex case as linear programming (LP) problems, and in the non-convex case as mixed integer programming (MIP) problems. In this paper, we introduce EBB algorithm, for solving the non-convex single-period CHP models of a long-term planning problem under the deregulated power market. EBB is based on the Branch and Bound (B&B) algorithm where tight lower bounds are computed analytically for pruning the search tree and the LP sub-problems are solved through an efficient envelope-based dual algorithm. We compare the performance of EBB with realistic models against the ILOG CPLEX 9.0 MIP solver and the Power Simplex (PS)-based B&B algorithm (PBB). PS is an efficient specialized primal-based Simplex, algorithm developed for convex CHP planning problems. EBB is from 661 to 955 times (with average 785) faster than CPLEX and from 11 to 31 times (with average 24) faster than PBB. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 431
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Multiperiod optimal power flow using benders decomposition [J].
Alguacil, N ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (01) :196-201
[2]   THE GENERALIZED UNIT COMMITMENT PROBLEM [J].
BALDICK, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1995, 10 (01) :465-475
[4]  
BOS MFJ, 1996, ELECT POWER ENERGY S, V18, P205
[5]  
*CEC, 1997, COM1997514 CEC
[6]  
CLAUSEN J, 1999, BRACH BOUND ALGORITH
[7]  
Commission of the European Communities, 2000, COM200087 COMM EUR C
[8]  
Dantzig G. B., 1963, LINEAR PROGRAMMING E
[9]  
*EUR COMM, 2000, PROP DIR EUR PARL CO
[10]   Joint planning of combined heat and power and electric power systems: An efficient model formulation [J].
Gardner, DT ;
Rogers, JS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 102 (01) :58-72