Cochlear implants and quality of life:: A prospective study

被引:81
作者
Mo, B [1 ]
Lindbæk, M [1 ]
Harris, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Rikshosp, ORL Dept, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00003446-200504000-00006
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate changes in quality of life, anxiety, and depression after cochlear implantation in adults. Design: Twenty-seven postlingually deafened adults who had received a MED-EL Combi 40+ implant were investigated. One generic Health-Related Quality of Life measure, the SF-36, two disease-specific measures, the Patient Quality of Life Form (PQLF) and the Index Relative Questionnaire Form (IRQF) completed by a near relative to the patient, in addition to a domain specific measure, the Hopkins Symptom Check List 25 items (HSCL-25), were used in a prospective study. The subjects were investigated before surgery and 12 to 15 months after surgery. Results: The scores were significantly better after surgery in four of six categories of the PQLF. In the IRQF, where a family member of the cochlear implant recipient was studied, the scores were significantly better in four of five categories. There was a significant improvement in the HSCL-25 scores after surgery. In the SF-36, only one of eight scales showed significant improvement. Conclusions: Cochlear implants were associated with statistically significant improvement in quality of life in postlingually deafened adults. The improvements were largest in the categories concerning communication, feelings of being a burden, isolation, and relations to friends and family. The implants also improved the relatives' daily lives. There was a statistically significant reduction in degree of depression and anxiety. Reduction in anxiety and depression was associated with gain in quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 194
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Bowling A., 2001, MEASURING DIS REV DI, VSecond
[2]   Economic evaluation of the cochlear implant [J].
Carter, R ;
Hailey, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 15 (03) :520-530
[3]   Cost-utility of the cochlear implant in adults -: A meta-analysis [J].
Cheng, AK ;
Niparko, JK .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1999, 125 (11) :1214-1218
[4]   Technology and the future of cochlear implants [J].
Clopton, BM ;
Spelman, FA .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 112 (09) :26-32
[5]  
CRARY WG, 1982, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V91, P55
[6]   HOPKINS SYMPTOM CHECKLIST (HSCL) - SELF-REPORT SYMPTOM INVENTORY [J].
DEROGATIS, LR ;
LIPMAN, RS ;
RICKELS, K ;
UHLENHUTH, EH ;
COVI, L .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1974, 19 (01) :1-15
[7]  
Evans A R, 1995, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, V166, P239
[8]  
Fayers P. M., 2008, QUALITY LIFE ASSESSM, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01082_11.x
[9]   MULTIATTRIBUTE HEALTH-STATUS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS - HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX [J].
FEENY, D ;
FURLONG, W ;
BOYLE, M ;
TORRANCE, GW .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1995, 7 (06) :490-502
[10]   Speech recognition in background noise of cochlear implant patients [J].
Fetterman, BL ;
Domico, EH .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2002, 126 (03) :257-263