Dominant Technology Identification Model Based on Patent Information Toward Sustainable Energy Development

被引:4
作者
Wang, Hongying [1 ]
Sun, Bing [1 ]
Wang, Peng [2 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Engn Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Elect & Informat Engn, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Patents; Wind power generation; Visualization; Data visualization; Databases; Hydroelectric power generation; Wind energy; Gephi; leading technology identification; PageRank algorithm; sustainable energy; CITATIONS;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939381
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Sustainable energy offers advantages of continuous regeneration, sustainable utilization, and inexhaustibility and plays an important role in the development of the world. In recent years, research on sustainable energy has become an important focus; however, leading sustainable energy technology deserves more attention. Identifying the dominant technology is significant for the decision-making and strategic layout of enterprises. In contrast to traditional technology identification methods, this study proposes a visual analysis model based on the patent-citation relationship. The visual analysis presented in this paper is divided into two parts: In the first part, the patent mutual citation data is input into the visualization software Gephi to identify the leading technology at the visual processing stage. Then, the PageRank algorithm is used to cross contrast the technical value and build the leading technology recognition model. The second part verifies the accuracy of the visual model and evaluates the technical value of each patent using the following five indexes: number of patent cited, patent number of the same family, scope of patent coverage, claim number of each patent, and number of patent litigation. Data of three sustainable energy technologies from the Worldwide Patent Statistical Database (PATSTAT) from 1900 to 2017 were used: solar power generation technology, hydroelectric power generation technology and wind power generation technology. The visual model correctly identified the leading technology. The results also explained the choice of the PageRank algorithm and the five indicators are most scientific and reasonable for the identification of dominant technology.
引用
收藏
页码:141374 / 141385
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   An application of fuzzy methods to evaluate a patent under the chance of litigation [J].
Agliardi, Elettra ;
Agliardi, Rossella .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (10) :13143-13148
[2]   DIRECT VALIDATION OF CITATION COUNTS AS INDICATORS OF INDUSTRIALLY IMPORTANT PATENTS [J].
ALBERT, MB ;
AVERY, D ;
NARIN, F ;
MCALLISTER, P .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (03) :251-259
[3]  
Bastian M., Gephi: an Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks, DOI 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
[4]   The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine [J].
Brin, S ;
Page, L .
COMPUTER NETWORKS AND ISDN SYSTEMS, 1998, 30 (1-7) :107-117
[5]   Recognition of emerging technology trends: class-selective study of citations in the US Patent Citation Network [J].
Bruck, Peter ;
Rethy, Istvan ;
Szente, Judit ;
Tobochnik, Jan ;
Erdi, Peter .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 107 (03) :1465-1475
[6]  
Carpenter M.P., 1981, World Patent Information, V3, P160, DOI DOI 10.1016/0172-2190(81)90098-3
[7]   Settlement during patent litigation trials. An empirical analysis for Germany [J].
Cremers, Katrin .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2009, 34 (02) :182-195
[8]   Identifying barriers to wind energy diffusion in Colombia: A function analysis of the technological innovation system and the wider context [J].
Edsand, Hans-Erik .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2017, 49 :1-15
[9]   Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network [J].
Erdi, Peter ;
Makovi, Kinga ;
Somogyvari, Zoltan ;
Strandburg, Katherine ;
Tobochnik, Jan ;
Volf, Peter ;
Zalanyi, Laszlo .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 95 (01) :225-242
[10]   Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights [J].
Harhoff, D ;
Scherer, FM ;
Vopel, K .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (08) :1343-1363