A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for multiple injection axillary brachial plexus block

被引:211
作者
Casati, Andrea
Danelli, Giorgio
Baciarello, Marco
Corradi, Maurizio
Leone, Stefania
Di Cianni, Simone
Fanelli, Guido
机构
[1] Osped Maggiore Parma, Dept Hand Surg, I-43100 Parma, Italy
[2] Univ Parma, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Therapy, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.anes.0000265159.55179.e1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: This prospective, randomized, blinded study tested the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance can shorten the onset time of axillary brachial plexus block as compared with nerve stimulation guidance when using a multiple injection technique. Methods: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I-III patients receiving axillary brachial plexus block with 20 ml ropivacaine, 0.75%, using a multiple injection technique, were randomly allocated to receive either nerve stimulation (group NS, n = 30), or ultrasound guidance (group US, n = 30) for nerve location. A blinded observer recorded the onset of sensory and motor blocks, the need for general anesthesia (failed block) or greater than 100 mu g fentanyl (insufficient block) to complete surgery, procedure-related pain, success rate, and patient satisfaction. Results: The median (range) number of needle passes was 4 (3-8) in group US and 8 (5-13) in group NS (P = 0.002). The onset of sensory block was shorter in group US (14 6 min) than in group NS (18 6 min) (P = 0.01), whereas no differences were observed in onset of motor block (24 8 min in group US and 25 8 min in group NS; P = 0.33) and readiness to surgery (26 8 min in group US and 28 9 min in group NS; P = 0.48). No failed block was reported in either group. Insufficient block was observed in 1 patient (3%) of group US and 2 patients (6%) of group NS (P = 0.61). Procedure-related pain was reported in 6 patients (20%) of group US and 14 patients (48%) of group NS (P = 0.028); patient acceptance was similarly good in the two groups. Conclusion: Multiple injection axillary block with ultrasound guidance provided similar success rates and comparable incidence of complication as compared with nerve stimulation guidance.
引用
收藏
页码:992 / 996
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block: A clinical comparison with 0.5% bupivacaine
    Bertini, L
    Tagariello, V
    Mancini, S
    Ciaschi, A
    Posteraro, CM
    Di Benedetto, P
    Martini, O
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1999, 24 (06) : 514 - 518
  • [2] BROWNER WS, 1988, ESTIMATING SAMPLE SI, P139
  • [3] Casati A, 2001, Minerva Anestesiol, V67, P407
  • [4] Casati A, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V93, P183
  • [5] A double-blind study of axillary brachial plexus block by 0.75% ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine
    Casati, A
    Leoni, A
    Aldegheri, G
    Berti, M
    Torri, G
    Fanelli, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (05) : 549 - 552
  • [6] Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block
    Chan, VWS
    Perlas, A
    Rawson, R
    Odukoya, O
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (05) : 1514 - 1517
  • [7] Peripheral nerve stimulation in the practice of brachial plexus anesthesia:: A review
    De Andrés, J
    Sala-Blanch, X
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2001, 26 (05) : 478 - 483
  • [8] Location, location, location! Ultrasound imaging in regional anaesthesia
    Denny, NA
    Harrop-Griffiths, W
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 94 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [9] Nerve stimulator and multiple injection technique for upper and lower limb blockade: Failure rate, patient acceptance, and neurologic complications
    Fanelli, G
    Casati, A
    Garancini, P
    Torri, G
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (04) : 847 - 852
  • [10] Interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with small volumes of ropivacaine 0.75%: effects of the injection technique on the onset time of nerve blockade
    Fanelli, G
    Casati, A
    Beccaria, P
    Cappelleri, G
    Albertin, A
    Torri, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 18 (01) : 54 - 58