Risk-Based Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Ship Emergency Management

被引:17
作者
Blindheim, Simon [1 ]
Gros, Sebastien [2 ]
Johansen, Tor Arne [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Autonomous Marine Operat & Syst, Dept Engn Cybernet, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Engn Cybernet, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Model Predictive Control; Risk Control; Autonomous Control; Decision-Making; Emergency Management; Trajectory Planning; Online Optimization; Maritime Systems; AVOIDANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1456
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Control for semi- and fully-autonomous ships is a broad and complex field. Making autonomous high-level decisions in place of the captain is considered difficult, partly due to the risks and uncertainties involved. Though human operators located in onshore control centers are still needed for safety and regulatory reasons, there is a growing demand for complex decisions to be made by the onboard control system itself, both during normal operations and extraordinary circumstances. Model predictive control (MPC) is a promising approach to tackle this problem. In this paper, a dynamic risk-based decision-making algorithm is constructed through the use of heuristic objectives, capable of planning suitable vessel trajectories in emergency situations. Nonlinear programming using the direct multiple-shooting method implemented with the CasADi framework is considered, and the resulting control performance of several emergency scenarios is analyzed using simulation. The developed algorithm proved capable of both generating suitable trajectories below a certain risk threshold, and to engage the safety systems appropriately. It is concluded that MPC with independent risk cost terms is a promising method for autonomous ship trajectory planning and emergency management. Copyright (C) 2020 The Authors.
引用
收藏
页码:14524 / 14531
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Anderson SJ, 2011, SPRINGER TRAC ADV RO, V70, P39
[2]  
Andersson J., 2012, Lect Notes Comput Sci Eng, P297, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-30023-3_27, 10.1007/978-3-642-30023-3_27, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-30023-327]
[3]   Obstacle Avoidance for Low-Speed Autonomous Vehicles With Barrier Function [J].
Chen, Yuxiao ;
Peng, Huei ;
Grizzle, Jessy .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 26 (01) :194-206
[4]  
Eriksen BOH, 2017, 2017 IEEE CONFERENCE ON CONTROL TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS (CCTA 2017), P766, DOI 10.1109/CCTA.2017.8062554
[5]  
Fossen T.I., 2011, HDB MARINE CRAFT HYD
[6]  
Fossen T.I., 2003, 6 IFAC C MAN CONTR M
[7]  
Grüne L, 2017, COMMUN CONTROL ENG, P45, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46024-6_3
[8]   Ship Collision Avoidance Using Scenario-Based Model Predictive Control [J].
Johansen, Tor A. ;
Cristofaro, Andrea ;
Perez, Tristan .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2016, 49 (23) :14-21
[9]  
Keviczky T., 2006, 2006 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 06CH37776C)
[10]   Autonomous maritime collision avoidance: Field verification of autonomous surface vehicle behavior in challenging scenarios [J].
Kufoalor, D. K. M. ;
Johansen, T. A. ;
Brekke, E. F. ;
Hepso, A. ;
Trnka, K. .
JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS, 2020, 37 (03) :387-403