SITE-SPECIFIC PROBABILISTIC ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF A VOLATILE CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON-CONTAMINATED TIDAL ESTUARY

被引:20
作者
Hunt, James [1 ]
Birch, Gavin [1 ]
Warne, Michael St. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Environm Geol Grp, Sch Geosci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Ctr Environm Contaminants Res, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia
关键词
Probabilistic ecological risk assessment; Quantitative risk; Tidal estuary; Chlorinated hydrocarbon; TOXICITY; TARGET;
D O I
10.1002/etc.130
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Groundwater contaminated with volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons (VCHs) was identified as discharging to Penrhyn Estuary, an intertidal embayment of Botany Bay, New South Wales, Australia. A screening-level hazard assessment of surface water in Penrhyn Estuary identified an unacceptable hazard to marine organisms posed by VCHs. Given the limitations of hazard assessments, the present study conducted a higher-tier, quantitative probabilistic risk assessment using the joint probability curve (JPC) method that accounted for variability in exposure and toxicity profiles to quantify risk (delta). Risk was assessed for 24 scenarios, including four areas of the estuary based on three exposure scenarios (low tide, high tide, and both low and high tides) and two toxicity scenarios (chronic no-observed-effect concentrations [NOEC] and 50% effect concentrations [EC50]). Risk (delta) was greater at low tide than at high tide and varied throughout the tidal cycle. Spatial distributions of risk in the estuary were similar using both NOEC and EC50 data. The exposure scenario including data combined from both tides was considered the most accurate representation of the ecological risk in the estuary. When assessing risk using data across both tides, the greatest risk was identified in the Springvale tributary (delta = 25%)-closest to the source area followed by the inner estuary (delta = 4%) and the Floodvale tributary (delta = 2%), with the lowest risk in the outer estuary (delta = 0.1%), farthest from the source area. Going from the screening level ecological risk assessment (ERA) to the probabilistic ERA changed the risk from unacceptable to acceptable in 50% of exposure scenarios in two of the four areas within the estuary. The probabilistic ERA provided a more realistic assessment of risk than the screening-level hazard assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010;29: I 172-1181. (C) 2010 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:1172 / 1181
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Aldenberg T, 2002, ENVIRON ECOL RISK AS, P49
[2]  
Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, 2000, AUSTR NZ GUID FRESH, V1
[3]   A warning: NOECs are inappropriate for regulatory use [J].
Chapman, PM ;
Caldwell, RS ;
Chapman, PF .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1996, 15 (02) :77-79
[4]   LIFE TABLE EVALUATION OF CHRONIC EXPOSURE TO A PESTICIDE [J].
DANIELS, RE ;
ALLAN, JD .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1981, 38 (05) :485-494
[5]  
DAY KE, 1987, ENV POLLUT, V44
[6]   Technical basis for narcotic chemicals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon criteria. I. Water and tissue [J].
Di Toro, DM ;
McGrath, JA ;
Hansen, DJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2000, 19 (08) :1951-1970
[7]   A CRITIQUE OF THE USE OF DISTRIBUTION-BASED EXTRAPOLATION MODELS IN ECOTOXICOLOGY [J].
FORBES, TL ;
FORBES, VE .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1993, 7 (03) :249-254
[8]  
Gilbert R.O., 1987, Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring
[9]   The need for multiple lines of evidence for predicting site-specific ecological effects [J].
Hall, LW ;
Giddings, JM .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2000, 6 (04) :679-710
[10]   New technique for estimating thresholds of toxicity in ecological risk assessment [J].
Hanson, ML ;
Solomon, KR .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (15) :3257-3264