Farmers' perception of aggression between growing pigs

被引:20
作者
Camerlink, Irene [1 ]
Turner, Simon P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Scotlands Rural Coll SRUC, Anim & Vet Sci Res Grp, Anim Behav & Welf, West Mains Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Survey; Farmers; Pig; Aggression; Perception; ANIMAL-WELFARE; SOCIALISING PIGLETS; ATTITUDES; BEHAVIOR; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.009
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Sustainable animal production should take animal welfare into account. How animal welfare is incorporated into farming practices will, however, largely depend on the farmer's choices. These choices may depend on the farmer's perception of animal welfare and the willingness to change the current situation. Aggression between group housed pigs is a longstanding welfare issue and research efforts have resulted in little to no change in practice. Our objective was to gain insight into farmers' perception of aggression between growing pigs and their opinion about a method shown by research to reduce the expression of this behaviour. Pig farmers in the UK were asked about their management and perception regarding aggression through a postal survey. Respondents (n = 167) had a breeder-to-finisher farm (n = 114; 585 +/- 123 sows; range 0-7000), breeder-weaner farm (n = 10; 718 +/- 433 sows; range 15-45000), or grower/finisher farm (n = 32; 1291 +/- 187 grower/finishers; range 24-5000). The majority of the respondents (73%) did not consider aggression at weaning as a problem which needed to be addressed. For mixing at the finisher stage, 43% did consider aggression a problem and indicated they would consider a solution if available. Farmers who considered aggression at the grower/finisher facilities a problem were on average younger (55 +/- 12 years) than farmers who did not consider it a problem (61 +/- 12 years; P = 0.02). When respondents ranked welfare issues on what they found most important to reduce at the grower/finisher phase, they ranked tail/ear/flank biting as more important than mounting and lameness, but not different from aggression. Currently, 27% of the pig breeders (respondents keeping sows) applied co-mingling of piglets (i.e. 'socialization'), in which piglets are pre-weaning introduced to piglets of other litters to reduce aggression later on, and 22% had worked with such a strategy in the past. Farmers applying co-mingling did not differ in their perception of aggression compared to farmers who did not co-mingle. Respondents expressed concerns about co-mingling with regard to practical management (48%), aggression of the sow towards piglets (33%), reduced piglet growth rate (24%), fights between piglets (22%), cross-suckling (20%), missed suckling bouts (16%), and stress for the animals (16%). Half of the breeders were in favour of co-mingling (51%) whereas the other half was against (49%). As part of a sustainable approach, integrating all stakeholders, knowledge of farmers' perception of aggression may help align research questions in this area with the concerns of the stakeholders. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 47
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] AHDB, BPEX YB 2014 2015 KE
  • [2] Pig farmers' perceptions, attitudes, influences and management of information in the decision-making process for disease control
    Alarcon, Pablo
    Wieland, Barbara
    Mateus, Ana L. P.
    Dewberry, Chris
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2014, 116 (03) : 223 - 242
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, AGR UK 2013
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, PIG NEWS INF
  • [5] Scientists and Dutch Pig Farmers in Dialogue About Tail Biting: Unravelling the Mechanism of Multi-stakeholder Learning
    Benard, Marianne
    Schuitmaker, Tjerk Jan
    Buning, Tjard de Cock
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2014, 27 (03) : 431 - 452
  • [6] Animal welfare: the attitudes and behaviour of European pig farmers
    Bock, B. B.
    van Huik, M. M.
    [J]. BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2007, 109 (11): : 931 - 944
  • [7] Attitudes of Dutch Pig Farmers Towards Tail Biting and Tail Docking
    Bracke, M. B. M.
    De Lauwere, Carolien C.
    Wind, Samantha M. M.
    Zonerland, Johan J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2013, 26 (04) : 847 - 868
  • [8] Animal Welfare: An Aspect of Care, Sustainability, and Food Quality Required by the Public
    Broom, Donald M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 37 (01) : 83 - 88
  • [9] Why are most EU pigs tail docked? Economic and ethical analysis of four pig housing and management scenarios in the light of EU legislation and animal welfare outcomes
    D'Eath, R. B.
    Niemi, J. K.
    Ahmadi, B. Vosough
    Rutherford, K. M. D.
    Ison, S. H.
    Turner, S. P.
    Anker, H. T.
    Jensen, T.
    Busch, M. E.
    Jensen, K. K.
    Lawrence, A. B.
    Sandoe, P.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2016, 10 (04) : 687 - 699
  • [10] Socialising piglets before weaning improves social hierarchy formation when pigs are mixed post-weaning
    D'Eath, RB
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2005, 93 (3-4) : 199 - 211