Analysis of Raised Feature Failures on 3D Printed Injection Moulds

被引:18
作者
Bagalkot, Anurag [1 ]
Pons, Dirk [1 ]
Symons, Digby [1 ]
Clucas, Don [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Mech Engn, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand
关键词
rapid tooling; additive manufacturing; failure modes; injection moulding; STEREOLITHOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3390/polym13101541
中图分类号
O63 [高分子化学(高聚物)];
学科分类号
070305 ; 080501 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Polymer-based 3D Printed Injection Mould (3DIM) inserts are used as a cost-effective method for low volume injection moulding (50-500 parts). However, abrupt failure leading to a short tool life is a common shortcoming of 3DIM. Need: The underlying causes of raised feature failures on 3DIM are not well known. Failure is commonly attributed to bending or shearing of raised features on the tool. Understanding the causes may help in delaying the failure and increasing tool life. Approach: Tool failure was analysed from a first-principles perspective, using pressure and temperature fields as determined by mould flow simulation. Experimental results were also obtained for two types of tool material (Visijet M3-X and Digital ABS) with polycarbonate (Lexan 943A) as the part material. Findings: Results find against the idea that pin failure in 3DIM tools is caused by bending and shear failures induced by injection pressures. We also conclude that failure of raised features is not necessarily an abrupt failure as mentioned in the literature. Originality: The generally accepted explanation for the failure of raised features in 3DIM tooling is that injection pressures cause bending and shear failure. This paper disconfirms this notion on theoretical and experimental grounds.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A methodology for setting the injection moulding process parameters for polymer rapid tooling inserts [J].
Bagalkot, Anurag ;
Pons, Dirk ;
Clucas, Don ;
Symons, Digby .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (09) :1493-1505
[2]   Categorization of Failures in Polymer Rapid Tools Used for Injection Molding [J].
Bagalkot, Anurag ;
Pons, Dirk ;
Symons, Digby ;
Clucas, Don .
PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (01)
[3]  
Chua C. K., 2015, Handbook of Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, P2525, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4471-4670-439, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-4670-439, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-4670-4_39]
[4]   Failure of rapid prototype molds during injection molding [J].
Colton, JS ;
Crawford, J ;
Pham, G ;
Rodet, V .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 50 (01) :129-132
[5]   Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends [J].
Gardan, Julien .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2016, 54 (10) :3118-3132
[6]   Layer thickness and draft angle selection for stereolithography injection mould tooling [J].
Harris, R ;
Hopkinson, N ;
Newlyn, H ;
Hague, R ;
Dickens, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (03) :719-729
[7]   Predicting stereolithography injection mould tool behaviour using models to predict ejection force and tool strength [J].
Hopkinson, N ;
Dickens, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2000, 38 (16) :3747-3757
[8]   Using stereolithography tools for injection moulding: research into tensile tool failure and unexpected benefits of the process [J].
Hopkinson, N ;
Dickens, PM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2000, 214 (10) :891-899
[9]  
Kazmer David O., 2016, INJECTION MOLD DESIG
[10]   Volumetric shrinkage estimation of benchmark parts developed by rapid tooling mold insert [J].
Kumar, Sagar ;
Singh, Amit Kumar .
SADHANA-ACADEMY PROCEEDINGS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2020, 45 (01)