Laminar boundary layer separation over a fluttering panel induced by an oblique shock wave

被引:14
作者
Li, Yingkun [1 ]
Luo, Haoxiang [2 ]
Chen, Xiong [1 ]
Xu, Jinsheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
关键词
Panel flutter; Flow separation; Shock wave/boundary layer interaction; Fluid-structure interaction; AEROELASTIC STABILITY; SYSTEMS; DEFORMATION; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.06.008
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Panel flutter in the presence of oblique shock waves and the associated shock wave/boundary-layer interaction have been identified as one of typical phenomena in the design and optimization of air-breathing, high-speed flight vehicles. The current study investigates this phenomenon using a previously considered two-dimensional model where an elastic panel with both ends pinned is impinged at the mid-point by an oblique shock wave with specified strength. An in-house code was used to solve the Euler or the full viscous compressible Navier-Stokes equation and nonlinear structural dynamics of the panel, where the conventional serial staggered algorithm was adopted for the fluid-structure interaction. As compared with previous studies of this topic, we focus on the effect of surface velocity feedback (i.e., using boundary blowing and suction for flow control), as well as the effect of the upstream boundary layer thickness, on the panel's dynamic behavior, surface pressure distribution, and boundary-layer separation. The results show that for inviscid flow, boundary control with feedback gain above one can suppress the panel vibration; however, this effect is not clear for viscous flow, where feedback gain below one has some effect on attenuation of vibration. Further study shows that the panel velocity based control introduces a phase shift for the pressure in the inviscid flow as a damping effect, but the effect is not as strong in the viscous flow. Finally, the boundary layer thickness has a non-monotonic effect on the panel flutter and flow separation. At intermediate thicknesses considered here, the panel flutter is reduced and separation becomes less oscillatory. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 109
页数:20
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Blazek J., 2005, Blazek JBT-CFDP and A, VSecond, P5
  • [2] Boyer N.R, 2017, 58 AIAA ASCE AHS ASC, DOI [10.2514/6.2017-4040, DOI 10.2514/6.2017-4040]
  • [3] Features of shock-induced panel flutter in three-dimensional inviscid flow
    Boyer, Nathan R.
    McNamara, J. J.
    Gaitonde, D., V
    Barnes, Caleb J.
    Visbal, Miguel R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 83 : 490 - 506
  • [4] Brouwer K.R., 2018 AIAAASCEAHSASC, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2018-1448
  • [5] Interplay of Surface Deformation and Shock-Induced Separation in Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions
    Brouwer, Kirk R.
    Gogulapati, Abhijit
    McNamara, Jack J.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2017, 55 (12) : 4258 - 4273
  • [6] Brouwer KR, 2019, AIAA SCITECH FOR, DOI [10.2514/6.2019-1121, DOI 10.2514/6.2019-1121]
  • [7] Brouwer KR, 2015, 56 AIAA ASCE AHS ASC, DOI [10.2514/6.2015-0687, DOI 10.2514/6.2015-0687]
  • [8] Actuators for Active Flow Control
    Cattafesta, Louis N., III
    Sheplak, Mark
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 43, 2011, 43 : 247 - 272
  • [9] Recent research progress on unstart mechanism, detection and control of hypersonic inlet
    Chang, Juntao
    Li, Nan
    Xu, Kejing
    Bao, Wen
    Yu, Daren
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2017, 89 : 1 - 22
  • [10] Experiments on the Interaction of a Fast-Moving Shock with an Elastic Panel
    Daub, Dennis
    Willems, Sebastian
    Guelhan, Ali
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2016, 54 (02) : 670 - 678