Clinical Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Duodenal Lesions in Terms of Operative Technique and Management of Complications

被引:0
作者
Yan, Bo [1 ]
Li, Xiangjie [1 ]
Qiao, Yuqing [1 ]
Zhou, Linxiang [1 ]
Shen, Lei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Key Lab Hubei Prov Digest Syst Dis, Renmin Hosp, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Key Lab Hubei Prov Digest Syst Dis, Renmin Hosp, 238 Jiefang Rd, Wuhan 430060, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2022年 / 32卷 / 07期
关键词
endoscopic submucosal dissection; superficial duodenal epithelial tumors; complications; techniques; EARLY GASTRIC-CANCER; MUCOSAL RESECTION; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2022.0148
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been considered to be the most challenging because of its high incidence of complications, which has hindered the development of duodenal ESD. The aim of this study is to discuss operation tips for duodenal ESD and to assess the efficacy and safety of duodenal ESD.Patients and Methods: Eighty-two patients who underwent ESD in the digestive endoscope center for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors (SDETs) from January 2017 to June 2021 were studied. Patients were divided into three groups according to the occurrence of complications, and the clinical characteristics and surgical efficacy of each group were compared.Results: SDETs in 82 patients were completely removed by ESD, with a 97.5% R0 resection rate. The average size of resected lesions was 23.8 +/- 6.5 mm. There were significant differences in lesion size and operation time between the normal and intraprocedural complication groups (P < .05). Similarly, between the normal and delayed complication groups, significant differences were noted in lesion location, size, operation time, occupied circumference, and postoperative hospitalization duration (P < .05).Conclusion: Duodenal ESD is prone to complications that increase the complexity of the procedure. By improving the necessary technique and skills, duodenal ESD remains safe and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 793
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Nonampullary duodenal polyps: characteristics and endoscopic management
    Abbass, Rami
    Rigaux, Johanne
    Al-Kawas, Firas H.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (04) : 754 - 759
  • [2] The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy
    Acosta, Ruben D.
    Abraham, Neena S.
    Chandrasekhara, Vinay
    Chathadi, Krishnavel V.
    Early, Dayna S.
    Eloubeidi, Mohamad A.
    Evans, John A.
    Faulx, Ashley L.
    Fisher, Deborah A.
    Fonkalsrud, Lisa
    Hwang, Joo Ha
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    Lightdale, Jenifer R.
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Pasha, Shabana F.
    Saltzman, John R.
    Shaukat, Aasma
    Shergill, Amandeep K.
    Wang, Amy
    Cash, Brooks D.
    DeWitt, John M.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [3] EMR/ESD: Techniques, Complications, and Evidence
    Ahmed Y.
    Othman M.
    [J]. Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2020, 22 (8)
  • [4] Current Challenge: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors
    Akahoshi, Kazuya
    Kubokawa, Masaru
    Inamura, Kazuki
    Akahoshi, Kazuaki
    Shiratsuchi, Yuki
    Tamura, Shinichi
    [J]. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 21 (12)
  • [5] Follow-up after endoscopic snare resection of duodenal adenomas
    Apel, D
    Jakobs, R
    Spiethoff, A
    Riemann, JF
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 37 (05) : 444 - 448
  • [6] A Rare Case of Delayed Perigastric Abscess after Curative Resection of Early Gastric Cancer by Uncomplicated Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Successful Treatment with Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage
    Asayama, Naoki
    Nagata, Shinji
    Yukutake, Masanobu
    Takemoto, Hiroki
    Shigita, Kenjiro
    Aoyama, Taiki
    Fukumoto, Akira
    Mukai, Shinichi
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 60 (09) : 1383 - 1387
  • [7] Factors associated with delayed bleeding after resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps
    Elliott, Timothy R.
    Tsiamoulos, Zacharias P.
    Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
    Suzuki, Noriko
    Bourikas, Leonidas A.
    Hart, Ailsa
    Bassett, Paul
    Saunders, Brian P.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 50 (08) : 790 - 799
  • [8] Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Fujiya, Mikihiro
    Tanaka, Kazuyuki
    Dokoshi, Tatsuya
    Tominaga, Motoya
    Ueno, Nobuhiro
    Inaba, Yuhei
    Ito, Takahiro
    Moriichi, Kentaro
    Kohgo, Yutaka
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (03) : 583 - 595
  • [9] Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopically treated superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors
    Hara, Yuko
    Goda, Kenichi
    Dobashi, Akira
    Ohya, Tomohiko Richard
    Kato, Masayuki
    Sumiyama, Kazuki
    Mitsuishi, Takehiro
    Hirooka, Shinichi
    Ikegami, Masahiro
    Tajiri, Hisao
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 25 (06) : 707 - 718
  • [10] Rebleeding in patients with delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer
    Hashimoto, Minami
    Hatta, Waku
    Tsuji, Yosuke
    Yoshio, Toshiyuki
    Yabuuchi, Yohei
    Hoteya, Shu
    Doyama, Hisashi
    Nagami, Yasuaki
    Hikichi, Takuto
    Kobayashi, Masakuni
    Morita, Yoshinori
    Sumiyoshi, Tetsuya
    Iguchi, Mikitaka
    Tomida, Hideomi
    Inoue, Takuya
    Mikami, Tatsuya
    Hasatani, Kenkei
    Nishikawa, Jun
    Matsumura, Tomoaki
    Nebiki, Hiroko
    Nakamatsu, Dai
    Ohnita, Ken
    Suzuki, Haruhisa
    Ueyama, Hiroya
    Hayashi, Yoshito
    Sugimoto, Mitsushige
    Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
    Masamune, Atsushi
    Ohira, Hiromasa
    [J]. DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 33 (07) : 1120 - 1130