Feasibility of magnetic marker localisation for non-palpable breast cancer

被引:50
作者
Schermers, B. [1 ,3 ]
van der Hage, J. A. [1 ]
Loo, C. E. [2 ]
Peeter, M. T. F. D. Vrancken [1 ]
Winter-Warnars, H. A. O. [2 ]
van Duijnhoven, F. [1 ]
ten Haken, B. [3 ]
Muller, S. H. [4 ]
Ruers, T. J. M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, Div Diagnost Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Twente, MIRA Inst, Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Clin Phys, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Breast sparing surgery; Surgical localisation; Magnetism; Non-radioactive; RADIOACTIVE SEED LOCALIZATION; OCCULT LESION LOCALIZATION; WIRE-GUIDED LOCALIZATION; CONSERVING SURGERY; SENTINEL NODE; TRIAL; METAANALYSIS; SATISFACTION; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2017.03.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Accurate tumour localisation is essential for breast-conserving surgery of non-palpable tumours. Current localisation technologies are associated with disadvantages such as logistical challenges and migration issues (wire guided localisation) or legislative complexities and high administrative burden (radioactive localisation). We present MAgnetic MArker LOCalisation (MaMaLoc), a novel technology that aims to overcome these disadvantages using a magnetic marker and a magnetic detection probe. This feasibility study reports on the first experience with this new technology for breast cancer localisation. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with unifocal, non-palpable breast cancer were recruited. They received concurrent placement of the magnetic marker in addition to a radioactive iodine seed, which is standard of care in our clinic. In a subset of five patients, migration of the magnetic marker was studied. During surgery, a magnetic probe and gammaprobe were alternately used to localise the markers and guide surgery. The primary outcome parameter was successful transcutaneous identification of the magnetic marker. Additionally, data on radiologist and surgeon satisfaction were collected. Results: Magnetic marker placement was successful in all cases. Radiologists could easily adapt to the technology in the clinical workflow. Migration of the magnetic marker was negligible. The primary endpoint of the study was met with an identification rate of 100%. Both radiologists and surgeons reflected that the technology was intuitive to use and that it was comparable to radioactive iodine seed localisation. Conclusion: Magnetic marker localisation for non-palpable breast cancer is feasible and safe, and may be a viable non-radioactive alternative to current localisation technologies. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 56
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Magnetic sentinel node and occult lesion localization in breast cancer (MagSNOLL Trial)
    Ahmed, M.
    Anninga, B.
    Goyal, S.
    Young, P.
    Pankhurst, Q. A.
    Douek, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (06) : 646 - 652
  • [2] Radioactive seed localisation (RSL) in the treatment of non-palpable breast cancers: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmed, M.
    Douek, M.
    [J]. BREAST, 2013, 22 (04) : 383 - 388
  • [3] Surgical treatment of nonpalpable primary invasive and in situ breast cancer
    Ahmed, Muneer
    Rubio, Isabel T.
    Klaase, Joost M.
    Douek, Michael
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 12 (11) : 645 - 663
  • [4] Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction
    Al-Ghazal, SK
    Fallowfield, L
    Blamey, RW
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (15) : 1938 - 1943
  • [5] Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: An Adequate Localization Method without Seed Migration
    Alderliesten, Tanja
    Loo, Claudette E.
    Pengel, Kenneth E.
    Rutgers, Emiel J. Th.
    Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A.
    Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (06) : 594 - 601
  • [6] Radioactive seed localization for non-palpable breast cancer
    Barentsz, M. W.
    van den Bosch, M. A. A. J.
    Veldhuis, W. B.
    van Diest, P. J.
    Pijnappel, R. M.
    Witkamp, A. J.
    Verkooijen, H. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (05) : 582 - 588
  • [7] Localization techniques for guided surgical excision of non-palpable breast lesions
    Chan, Benjamin K. Y.
    Wiseberg-Firtell, Jill A.
    Jois, Ramesh H. S.
    Jensen, Katrin
    Audisio, Riccardo A.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (12):
  • [8] Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised
    Cochrane, RA
    Valasiadou, P
    Wilson, ARM
    Al-Ghazal, SK
    Macmillan, RD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (12) : 1505 - 1509
  • [9] Localization of impalpable breast lesions - A surgical approach
    dellaRovere, GQ
    Benson, JR
    Morgan, M
    Warren, R
    Patel, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 22 (05): : 478 - 482
  • [10] Sentinel Node Biopsy Using a Magnetic Tracer Versus Standard Technique: The SentiMAG Multicentre Trial
    Douek, Michael
    Klaase, Joost
    Monypenny, Ian
    Kothari, Ashutosh
    Zechmeister, Katalin
    Brown, Douglas
    Wyld, Lynda
    Drew, Philip
    Garmo, Hans
    Agbaje, Olorunsola
    Pankhurst, Quentin
    Anninga, Bauke
    Grootendorst, Maarten
    ten Haken, Bennie
    Hall-Craggs, Margaret A.
    Purushotham, Arnie
    Pinder, Sarah
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 1237 - 1245