Evaluation of raw milk quality in different production systems and periods of the year

被引:12
作者
Marcondes, Marcos Iancio [1 ]
Jacome, Daniele Canabrava [1 ]
da Silva, Alex Lopes [1 ]
Renno, Luciana Navajas [1 ]
dos Santos Pires, Ana Clarissa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Zootecnia, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Tecnol Alimentos, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE | 2014年 / 43卷 / 12期
关键词
fat; protein; SCC; TBC; SOMATIC-CELL COUNT; GRANDE-DO-SUL; PROTEOLYSIS; NITROGEN; CHEESE; SEASON; FAT;
D O I
10.1590/S1516-35982014001200007
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of raw milk in different production systems and its variation throughout the year. The data were collected from 943 dairy farms in the South, Central-West and Central regions of the state of Minas Gerais, and in Vale do Paraiba, in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The data were collected in the period from January 2009 to September 2011, in a total of 18,206 samples. The properties were divided into confinement, semi-confinement and extensive production systems. The evaluated factors were somatic cell count (SCC), total bacterial count (TBC) and protein and fat contents. There was no effect of production system on the contents of protein, fat and SCC. Total bacterial count, however, was affected by production. Seasonal variations were found for SCC, TBC, protein and fat; the highest protein values were found from March to June; the highest fat contents were obtained from May to August; and TBC and SCC, from December to March. The production system does not interfere with the percentage of fat and protein and SCC of the milk. However, confinement systems present a better TBC content. Both month and year are factors that interfere with TBC, SCC, protein and milk fat, and the best patterns are found in the coldest periods of the year.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 676
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, HIGIENE ALIMENTAR SA
[2]   Microbiological quality of refrigerated milk on farms [J].
Arcuri, E. E. ;
Brito, M. A. V. P. ;
Brito, J. R. F. ;
Pinto, S. M. ;
Angelo, F. F. ;
Souza, G. N. .
ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2006, 58 (03) :440-446
[3]   Potential to alter the content and composition of milk fat through nutrition [J].
Ashes, JR ;
Gulati, SK ;
Scott, TW .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1997, 80 (09) :2204-2212
[4]   Milk response to concentrate supplementation of high producing dairy cows grazing at two pasture allowances [J].
Bargo, F ;
Muller, LD ;
Delahoy, JE ;
Cassidy, TW .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2002, 85 (07) :1777-1792
[5]  
Bressan M., 2004, REV POLITICA AGRICOL, V13
[6]  
Carvalho M. P., 2000, 1 CURSO ONLINE QUALI
[7]  
Castro C. C. D., 1998, REV ADM CONT, V2, P143
[8]   NUTRITIONAL FACTORS INFLUENCING THE NITROGEN COMPOSITION OF BOVINE-MILK - A REVIEW [J].
DEPETERS, EJ ;
CANT, JP .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1992, 75 (08) :2043-2070
[9]   NONPROTEIN NITROGEN AND PROTEIN DISTRIBUTION IN THE MILK OF COWS [J].
DEPETERS, EJ ;
FERGUSON, JD .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1992, 75 (11) :3192-3209
[10]   Proteolysis in cheese during ripening [J].
Fox, PF ;
McSweeney, PLH .
FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 12 (04) :457-509