Bactericidal and Virucidal Activity of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Cleansers in an In Vivo Hand Hygiene Clinical Simulation Study

被引:49
作者
Eggers, Maren [1 ]
Koburger-Janssen, Torsten [2 ]
Ward, Lois S. [3 ]
Newby, Craig [4 ]
Mueller, Stefan [5 ]
机构
[1] Lab Prof Gisela Enders MVZ GbR, Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Hyg Nord GmbH, Greifswald, Germany
[3] Mundipharma Res Ltd, Clin Operat, Cambridge, England
[4] Mundipharma Mfg Pte Ltd, R&D, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Mundipharma Res GmbH & Co KG, Pharmacol & Translat Sci, Limburg, Germany
关键词
Antimicrobial wash; Bactericidal activity; Chlorhexidine gluconate; Escherichia coli; Hand-cleansing agents; Hand hygiene; Infection control; Non-enveloped virus; Povidone-iodine; Virucidal activity; RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS; AGENTS; INACTIVATION; EFFICACY; VITRO; DISINFECTION; CORONAVIRUS;
D O I
10.1007/s40121-018-0202-5
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Introduction: Standard in vitro and in vivo tests help demonstrate efficacy of hand hygiene products; however, there is no standard in vivo test method for viruses. We investigated the bactericidal and virucidal efficacy of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) 7.5% scalp and skin cleanser, chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) 4% hand cleanser and the reference hand wash (soft soap) in 15 healthy volunteers following European Standard EN1499 (hygienic hand wash test method for bacteria), which was adapted for virucidal testing. Methods: Separate test series were performed for bactericidal (Escherichia coli) and virucidal [murine norovirus (MNV)] testing. After pre-washing and artificial contamination of hands with test organisms, volunteers underwent testing with 3 and 5 mL of each product for contact times of 15, 30 and 60 s according to a Latin-square randomization. The number of test organisms released from fingertips into sampling fluids was assessed before and after hand washing and mean log(10) reduction factor (RF) was calculated. RFs (test-reference) were compared using a Wilcoxon-Wilcox multiple comparisons test per EN1499; efficacy was concluded if p >= 0.01. Results: PVP-I 7.5% and CHG 4% cleansers both passed EN1499 requirements against E. coli, with statistically significantly greater (p <= 0.01) mean log(10) RFs compared with reference soft soap across all tests (PVP-I: 4.09-5.27; CHG: 4.12-5.22; soap: 2.75-3.11). The experimental design using EN1499 was applicable to testing with MNV as discriminatory and reproducible results were generated. Mean log(10) RFs of MNV were statistically significantly greater for PVP-I (1.57-2.57) compared with soft soap (1.24-1.62), while mean log(10) RFs with CHG (0.90-1.34) were lower than for soft soap across all tests. Conclusion: PVP-I 7.5% cleanser showed superior efficacy against MNV compared to soft soap and CHG 4% cleanser, while both PVP-I and CHG were superior to soft soap against E. coli. The experimental set-up may be applicable to future testing for antiviral hand washes.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 247
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, E227610 ASTM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EN12762009
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, E117413 ASTM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care is Safer Care, DOI DOI 10.1086/600379
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, EN15002013
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, EN144762013FPRA12015
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, E183817 ASTM
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2013, EN14992013
[9]   TEST FOR HYGIENIC HAND DISINFECTION [J].
AYLIFFE, GAJ ;
BABB, JR ;
QUORAISHI, AH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1978, 31 (10) :923-928
[10]   HAND DISINFECTION - A COMPARISON OF VARIOUS AGENTS IN LABORATORY AND WARD STUDIES [J].
AYLIFFE, GAJ ;
BABB, JR ;
DAVIES, JG ;
LILLY, HA .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1988, 11 (03) :226-243