The time-course of lexical and structural processes in sentence comprehension

被引:18
作者
Tily, Harry [1 ]
Fedorenko, Evelina [2 ]
Gibson, Edward
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Linguist, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Time-course; Sentence comprehension; Parsing; Reading time; Frequency; THEMATIC ROLE INFORMATION; RELATIVE CLAUSES; WORKING-MEMORY; EYE-MOVEMENTS; CONSTRAINTS; DISCOURSE; AMBIGUITY; CONTEXT; INTERFERENCE; PLAUSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1080/17470210903114866
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Online sentence comprehension involves multiple types of cognitive processes: lexical processes such as lexical access, which call on the user's knowledge of the meaning of words in the language, and structural processes such as the integration of incoming words into an emerging representation. In this article, we investigate the temporal dynamics of lexical access and syntactic integration. Unlike much previous work that has relied on temporary ambiguity to investigate this question, we manipulate the frequency of the verb in unambiguous structures involving a well-studied syntactic complexity manipulation (subject-vs. object-extracted clefts). The results demonstrate that for high-frequency verbs, the difficulty of reading a more structurally complex object-extracted cleft structure relative to a less structurally complex subject-extracted cleft structure is largely experienced in the cleft region, whereas for low-frequency verbs this difficulty is largely experienced in the postcleft region. We interpret these results as evidence that some stages of structural processing follow lexical processing. Furthermore, we find evidence that structural processing may be delayed if lexical processing is costly, and that the delay is proportional to the difficulty of the lexical process. Implications of these results for contemporary accounts of sentence comprehension are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 927
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Web 1T 5-gram Version 1
[4]  
Bates D., 2008, Ime4: linear mixed-effects models using s4 classes
[5]  
Bever T. G, 1970, Cognition and The Development of Language
[6]   Resolving syntactic category ambiguities in discourse context: Probabilistic and discourse constraints [J].
Boland, JE .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 36 (04) :588-615
[7]   Understanding the constraints on syntactic generation: Lexical bias and discourse congruency effects on eye movements [J].
Boland, JE ;
Blodgett, A .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2001, 45 (03) :391-411
[8]   The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited [J].
Clifton, C ;
Traxler, MJ ;
Mohamed, MT ;
Williams, RS ;
Morris, RK ;
Rayner, K .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 49 (03) :317-334
[9]  
Clifton C., 1989, Linguistic structure in language processing, P273, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-2729-2_8
[10]  
Clifton Charles Jr., 2007, P341, DOI 10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50017-3