Learning Curve for Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Systematic Review

被引:32
作者
Ahn, Yong [1 ]
Lee, Sol [2 ,3 ]
Son, Seong [1 ]
Kim, Ho [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Gil Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Coll Med, Incheon, South Korea
[2] BBKO Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Dept Hlth Policy, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Promot, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Discectomy; Endoscopic; Interlaminar; Learning curve; Lumbar; Operative time; Outcome; DISC HERNIATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; COMPLICATIONS; SURGEONS; MICRODISCECTOMY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.128
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) is an efficient surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation. However, this minimally invasive procedure requires a considerable learning curve that has not yet been standardized. This review aimed to evaluate the learning curve's characteristics, including the cutoff point required to achieve technical proficiency and to discuss appropriate training methods. METHODS: We systematically searched the core databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) for clinical studies that evaluated the learning curve using quantitative data. We performed a quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We also compared descriptive statistics, including operative time and other variables before and after the cutoff point. RESULTS: Six studies reporting 302 cases of IELD were selected from 7188 screened articles. The cutoff point was randomly set in 3 studies and determined as the curve's asymptote in 3 studies. The mean value for the cutoff point was 22.17 +/- 12.40 cases (range: 10-43 cases) and mainly determined based on the operative time, which was shorter in the late group than that in the early group (P < 0.05). The cutoff points were not significant for patient outcome parameters such as pain score, functional result, surgical failure, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of published studies regarding the learning curve for the IELD technique is insufficient. The reported cutoff points may be significant only for task efficiency. Moreover, they may not represent the asymptote of the curve. Future studies should evaluate the actual plateau points using patient outcome data.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Learning Curve for Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Systematic Review [J].
Ahn, Yong ;
Lee, Sol ;
Son, Seong ;
Kim, Ho ;
Kim, Ji Eun .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 143 :471-479
[2]  
Ahn Y, 2019, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V22, P295
[3]  
Ahn Y, 2012, EXPERT REV MED DEVIC, V9, P361, DOI [10.1586/erd.12.23, 10.1586/ERD.12.23]
[4]   Training in robotics: The learning curve and contemporary concepts in training [J].
Bach, Christian ;
Miernik, Arkadiusz ;
Schoenthaler, Martin .
ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 12 (01) :58-61
[5]   Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve using LC-CUSUM [J].
Biau, D. J. ;
Williams, S. M. ;
Schlup, M. M. ;
Nizard, R. S. ;
Porcher, R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (07) :925-929
[6]  
Birkenmaier C, 2013, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V16, P335
[7]   Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for intracanalicular disc herniations at L5-S1 using a rigid working channel endoscope [J].
Choi, G ;
Lee, SH ;
Raiturker, PP ;
Lee, S ;
Chae, YS .
NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 58 (02) :59-67
[8]   A meta-analysis of endoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disk herniation [J].
Cong, Lin ;
Zhu, Yue ;
Tu, Guanjun .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (01) :134-143
[9]  
Cook Jonathan A, 2004, Clin Trials, V1, P421, DOI 10.1191/1740774504cn042oa
[10]   A prospective, randomized study comparing the results of open discectomy with those of video-assisted arthroscopic microdiscectomy [J].
Hermantin, FU ;
Peters, T ;
Quartararo, L ;
Kambin, P .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (07) :958-965