Modeling of interlayer contact and contact pressure during fused filament fabrication

被引:96
作者
Coogan, Timothy J. [1 ,2 ]
Kazmer, David O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Plast Engn, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
[2] St Gobain Res North Amer, Northborough, MA 01532 USA
关键词
MANUFACTURING PROCESS; BOND STRENGTH; HEAT-TRANSFER; POLYMER; PART; SIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; TIME;
D O I
10.1122/1.5093033
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
An in-line rheometer and data acquisition system are used to monitor the melt pressure, melt temperature, and environmental temperatures while producing parts via fused filament fabrication (FFF). Melt pressures are observed to increase when printing parts with small layer heights, which is attributed to the confined space created between the nozzle and the previous layer (i.e., an exit pressure). These exit pressures (referred to as contact pressure) and the resulting interlayer contact areas are analyzed for 2863 layers created at 21 different processing conditions. The measured contact pressure was found to directly influence the shape of the layers and the resulting interlayer contact. An intimate contact model based on contact pressure is combined with a wetting model to accurately predict the interlayer contact of FFF parts. This pressure-driven intimate contact model for FFF shows strong agreement with the observed interlayer contact. No theoretical model has previously existed for predicting interlayer contact, so this research provides a critical component for developing a comprehensive part strength model. Both the measurements and proposed model are sufficiently simple and accurate for real-time analysis of FFF quality, so the described in-line sensors provide valuable quality insights and are recommended for future researchers, printer manufacturers, and end-users. (C) 2019 Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 672
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Process-structure-property effects on ABS bond strength in fused filament fabrication [J].
Abbott, A. C. ;
Tandon, G. P. ;
Bradford, R. L. ;
Koerner, H. ;
Baur, J. W. .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 19 :29-38
[2]   Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS [J].
Ahn, SH ;
Montero, M ;
Odell, D ;
Roundy, S ;
Wright, PK .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (04) :248-257
[3]  
Bartolai J., 2016, Solid Freeform Fabrication 2016: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International, P951
[4]  
Bellehumeur C., 2004, J Manuf Process, V6, P170, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1526-6125(04)70071-7
[5]   Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling [J].
Bellini, A ;
Güçeri, S .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2003, 9 (04) :252-264
[6]   An analysis of mechanisms governing fusion bonding of thermoplastic composites [J].
Butler, CA ;
McCullough, RL ;
Pitchumani, R ;
Gillespie, JW .
JOURNAL OF THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 1998, 11 (04) :338-363
[7]   In-line rheological monitoring of fused deposition modeling [J].
Coogan, Timothy J. ;
Kazmer, David O. .
JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY, 2019, 63 (01) :141-155
[8]   Healing simulation for bond strength prediction of FDM [J].
Coogan, Timothy J. ;
Kazmer, David O. .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (03) :551-561
[9]   Bond and part strength in fused deposition modeling [J].
Coogan, Timothy J. ;
Kazmer, David Owen .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (02) :414-422
[10]   Thermal conditions affecting heat transfer in FDM/FFE: a contribution towards the numerical modelling of the process This paper investigates convection, conduction and radiation phenomena in the filament deposition process [J].
Costa, S. F. ;
Duarte, F. M. ;
Covas, J. A. .
VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2015, 10 (01) :35-46