Fumarate production with Rhizopus oryzae: utilising the Crabtree effect to minimise ethanol by-product formation

被引:21
作者
Swart, Reuben M. [1 ]
le Roux, Francois [1 ]
Naude, Andre [1 ]
de Jongh, Nicolaas W. [1 ]
Nicol, Willie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Dept Chem Engn, Lynnwood Rd, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Fumarate; Fumaric acid; Rhizopus oryzae; Crabtree effect; Ethanol; Immobilised fermentation; ACID PRODUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; PELLET FORMATION; FERMENTATION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13068-020-1664-8
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background The four-carbon dicarboxylic acids of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (malate, fumarate and succinate) remain promising bio-based alternatives to various precursor chemicals derived from fossil-based feed stocks. The double carbon bond in fumarate, in addition to the two terminal carboxylic groups, opens up an array of downstream reaction possibilities, where replacement options for petrochemical derived maleic anhydride are worth mentioning. To date the most promising organism for producing fumarate is Rhizopus oryzae (ATCC 20344, also referred to as Rhizopus delemar) that naturally excretes fumarate under nitrogen-limited conditions. Fumarate excretion in R. oryzae is always associated with the co-excretion of ethanol, an unwanted metabolic product from the fermentation. Attempts to eliminate ethanol production classically focus on enhanced oxygen availability within the mycelium matrix. In this study our immobilised R. oryzae process was employed to investigate and utilise the Crabtree characteristics of the organism in order to establish the limits of ethanol by-product formation under growth and non-growth conditions. Results All fermentations were performed with either nitrogen excess (growth phase) or nitrogen limitation (production phase) where medium replacements were done between the growth and the production phase. Initial experiments employed excess glucose for both growth and production, while the oxygen partial pressure was varied between a dissolved oxygen of 18.4% and 85%. Ethanol was formed during both growth and production phases and the oxygen partial pressure had zero influence on the response. Results clearly indicated that possible anaerobic zones within the mycelium were not responsible for ethanol formation, hinting that ethanol is formed under fully aerobic conditions as a metabolic overflow product. For Crabtree-positive organisms like Saccharomyces cerevisiae ethanol overflow is manipulated by controlling the glucose input to the fermentation. The same strategy was employed for R. oryzae for both growth and production fermentations. It was shown that all ethanol can be eliminated during growth for a glucose addition rate of 0.07gL(-1)h(-1). The production phase behaved in a similar manner, where glucose addition of 0.197 g L-1 h-(1) resulted in fumarate production of 0.150 g L-1 h(-1) and a yield of 0.802 g g(-1) fumarate on glucose. Further investigation into the effect of glucose addition revealed that ethanol overflow commences at a glucose addition rate of 0.395 g g(-1) h(-1)on biomass, while the maximum glucose uptake rate was established to be between 0.426 and 0.533 g g(-1) h(-1). Conclusions: The results conclusively prove that R. oryzae is a Crabtree-positive organism and that the characteristic can be utilised to completely discard ethanol by-product formation. A state referred to as "homofumarate production" was illustrated, where all carbon input exits the cell as either fumarate or respiratory CO2. The highest biomass-based "homofumarate production": rate of 0.243 g g -1 h -1 achieved a yield of 0.802 g g -1on glucose, indicating the bounds for developing an ethanol free process. The control strategy employed in this study in conjunction with the uncomplicated scalability of the immobilised process provides new direction for further developing bio-fumarate production.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   FED BATCH CULTURE OF SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE - PERSPECTIVE OF COMPUTER CONTROL TO ENHANCE PRODUCTIVITY IN BAKERS-YEAST CULTIVATION [J].
AIBA, S ;
NAGAI, S ;
NISHIZAWA, Y .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1976, 18 (07) :1001-1016
[2]   Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of fumaric acid as a feed additive for all animal species [J].
Aquilina, Gabriele ;
Bach, Alex ;
Bampidis, Vasileios ;
Bastos, Maria De Lourdes ;
Flachowsky, Gerhard ;
Gasa-Gaso, Josep ;
Gralak, Mikolaj ;
Hogstrand, Christer ;
Leng, Lubomir ;
Lopez-Puente, Secundino ;
Martelli, Giovanna ;
Mayo, Baltasar ;
Renshaw, Derek ;
Rychen, Guido ;
Saarela, Maria ;
Sejrsen, Kristen ;
Van Beelen, Patrick ;
Wallace, Robert John ;
Westendorf, Johannes .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (02)
[3]   EXAMINATION OF THE CRABTREE EFFECT IN SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE - ROLE OF RESPIRATORY ADAPTATION [J].
BARFORD, JP ;
HALL, RJ .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1979, 114 (OCT) :267-275
[4]   CRABTREE EFFECT - A REGULATORY SYSTEM IN YEAST [J].
DEDEKEN, RH .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1966, 44 (02) :149-&
[5]   Production of fumaric acid by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of starchy materials with 2-deoxyglucose-resistant mutant strains of Rhizopus oryzae [J].
Deng, Yuefang ;
Li, Shuang ;
Xu, Qing ;
Gao, Min ;
Huang, He .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 107 :363-367
[6]  
Felthouse TR., 2001, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology
[7]  
Grand View Research, 2014, TECHNICAL REPORT
[8]   Preventing Overflow Metabolism in Crabtree-Positive Microorganisms through On-Line Monitoring and Control of Fed-Batch Fermentations [J].
Habegger, Loic ;
Crespo, Kelly Rodrigues ;
Dabros, Michal .
FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2018, 4 (03)
[9]   Towards large scale fermentative production of succinic acid [J].
Jansen, Mickel L. A. ;
van Gulik, Walter M. .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 30 :190-197
[10]   Strain Development and Medium Optimization for Fumaric Acid Production [J].
Kang, Seong Woo ;
Lee, Hawon ;
Kim, Daeheum ;
Lee, Dohoon ;
Kim, Sangyong ;
Chun, Gie-Taek ;
Lee, Jinwon ;
Kim, Seung Wook ;
Park, Chulhwan .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING, 2010, 15 (05) :761-769