Does investor risk perception drive asset prices in markets? Experimental evidence

被引:27
作者
Huber, Jurgen [1 ]
Palan, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Zeisberger, Stefan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Banking & Finance, Univ Str 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Dept Banking & Finance, Univ Str 15, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, Heyendaalseweg 141, NL-6525 AJ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Zurich, Dept Banking & Finance, Plattenstr 14, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Risk; Risk perception; Asset market; Experimental finance; Experimental economics; VOLATILITY INFORMATION; PROSPECT-THEORY; DETERMINANTS; EQUILIBRIUM; ATTITUDES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105635
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We explore how individual risk perception influences prices and trading behavior in a market setting. Specifically, our study lets experimental participants trade assets characterized by varying shapes of return distributions. While common mean-variance models predict identical prices for most of our assets, we find trading prices to differ significantly. Assets that are perceived as being less risky on average (despite having identical volatility) trade at significantly higher prices. Individually, traders who perceive a certain asset to be less risky are also net buyers on average. With regard to different risk measures, our results show that the probability of a loss is the strongest predictor of transaction prices and risk perception. All these results hold also for experienced traders and when traders can trade two assets at the same time. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   An Experimental Examination of Portfolio Choice [J].
Ackert, Lucy F. ;
Church, Bryan K. ;
Qi, Li .
REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2016, 20 (04) :1427-1447
[2]   Why stocks may disappoint [J].
Ang, A ;
Bekaert, G ;
Liu, J .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 76 (03) :471-508
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, BEHAV APPROACH ASSET
[4]   Do Retail Trades Move Markets? [J].
Barber, Brad M. ;
Odean, Terrance ;
Zhu, Ning .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (01) :151-186
[5]   Prospect theory and asset prices [J].
Barberis, N ;
Huang, M ;
Santos, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :1-53
[6]  
Baucells Manel., 2006, DECIS ANAL, V3, P163, DOI 10.1287/deca.1060.0075
[7]   MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE [J].
BENARTZI, S ;
THALER, RH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) :73-92
[8]   hroot: Hamburg Registration and Organization Online Tool [J].
Bock, Olaf ;
Baetge, Ingmar ;
Nicklisch, Andreas .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 71 :117-120
[9]   Risk as a primitive: A survey of measures of perceived risk [J].
Brachinger H.W. ;
Weber M. .
Operations-Research-Spektrum, 1997, 19 (4) :235-250
[10]   Improving Investment Decisions with Simulated Experience [J].
Bradbury, Meike A. S. ;
Hens, Thorsten ;
Zeisberger, Stefan .
REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2015, 19 (03) :1019-1052