Study on Trans-Boundary Water Quality and Quantity Ecological Compensation Standard: A Case of the Bahao Bridge Section in Yongding River, China

被引:12
作者
Wang, Yizhuo [1 ]
Yang, Rongjin [2 ]
Li, Xiuhong [1 ]
Zhang, Le [2 ]
Liu, Weiguo [3 ]
Zhang, Yi [1 ]
Liu, Yunzhi [1 ]
Liu, Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Global Change & Earth Syst Sci, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, 8 Da Yang Fang, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Urban Drainage Maintenance Management Linyi City, 86 Liuqing Dong Rd, Linyi 276000, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
ecological compensation; ecological compensation standard; payment for ecosystem services (PES); Yongding River; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; POLLUTION; PAYMENT; UPSTREAM;
D O I
10.3390/w13111488
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Watershed ecological compensation, as an important means to protect the environment and promote the sustainable and coordinated development of upstream and downstream has wide concern in China. At present, the compensation accounting method only assesses water quality. When applied to some northern rivers represented by the Yongding River, which are facing water shortage, the assessment of water quality indicators alone cannot effectively compensate the ecosystem service providers for their expenditure on the environment. This paper proposes a transboundary water quality and quantity ecological compensation standard model, which couples the water quality ecological compensation standard of pollutant reduction and the water quantity ecological compensation standard based on the restoration cost method. We set up two scenarios using the model to calculate the amount of compensation payable under the actual scenario in 2018, which is USD 68.2 million. The amount of compensation under the local environmental policy target scenario is USD 10.6-82.668-529 million. It was concluded that the funds obtained from this model can cover the rehabilitation cost and meet the benefits of the upstream and downstream, making compensation funds more reasonable. However, based on the cross-sectional assessment, there is still a lack of integrity and comprehensiveness for the river basin. The development of watershed ecological compensation should move from the game of upstream and downstream interests to a win-win situation.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, REG IMPL ENV PROT TA
  • [2] Beijing Survey Team, 2018, BEIJ NAT EC SOC DEV, P18
  • [3] Chen D.X., 2017, ENV PROT, V45, P31
  • [4] Chen Y., 2018, ENV SUSTAIN DEV, V43, P42
  • [5] A systematic approach of determining compensation and allocation for river basin water environment based on total pollutants control
    Cheng, Yuxiang
    Wu, Desheng
    Bian, Yuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 271
  • [6] Department of International Cooperation Science and Technology, 2014, COD RAT LIF DUR DES
  • [7] Computing payment for ecosystem services in watersheds: An analysis of the Middle Route Project of South-to-North Water Diversion in China
    Dong, Zhengju
    Yan, Yan
    Duan, Jing
    Fu, Xiao
    Zhou, Qingrong
    Huang, Xiang
    Zhu, Xiangen
    Zhao, Jingzhu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2011, 23 (12) : 2005 - 2012
  • [8] [耿翔燕 Geng Xiangyan], 2018, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V28, P140
  • [9] Haihe River Water Conservancy Commission Ministry of Water Resources, 2019, IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, P6
  • [10] The use of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) for identifying environmental costs
    Jasch, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2003, 11 (06) : 667 - 676