Does corporate R&D investment support to decrease of default probability of Asian firms?

被引:7
作者
Cherkasova, Victoria [1 ]
Kurlyanova, Alena [1 ]
机构
[1] NRU HSE, Fac Econ Sci, Sch Finance, 20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow 101000, Russia
关键词
Innovation; Bankruptcy; Financial constraints; Overinvestment; Underinvestment; High-tech firms; DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; AGENCY COSTS; CASH FLOW; RISK; CONSTRAINTS; INNOVATION; TRADEOFF; MODELS; RETURN;
D O I
10.1016/j.bir.2019.07.009
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the nature of the relationship between corporate R&D investment and the probability of default. Existing evidence on the topic is varied and often conflicting due to its complexity. In this paper, we investigated the non-linear relationship between R&D investment and the probability of default, and also detected several factors influencing the nature of the relationship. The research relies on the sample of Asian Tiger's countries (Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan) for the period from 2012 to 2017. Results of the research reveal a U-shaped relationship between corporate R&D investment and default probability. Considering the relationship more precisely, we divide the sample into two parts based on the availability of financial resources, and test the significance of this factor. R&D investment is found to significantly decrease default probability for financially constrained firms. We also examine the investment efficiency factor by comparing R&D investment and default probability between underinvesting and overinvesting firms. The rise of R&D investment decreases default probability for underinvesting firms, and increases - for overinvesting ones. Studying separately high-tech firms, we reveal that R&D investment leads to decrease of default probability. Copyright (C) 2019, Borsa Istanbul Anonim Sirketi. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 356
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MODELLING DEFAULT RI
[2]   Does market size structure affect competition? The case of small business lending [J].
Berger, Allen N. ;
Rosen, Richard J. ;
Udell, Gregory F. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2007, 31 (01) :11-33
[3]   Forecasting default with the Merton distance to default model [J].
Bharath, Sreedhar T. ;
Shumway, Tyler .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2008, 21 (03) :1339-1369
[4]   How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? [J].
Biddle, Gary C. ;
Hilary, Gilles ;
Verdi, Rodrigo S. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2009, 48 (2-3) :112-131
[5]   Innovation and the determinants of company survival [J].
Buddelmeyer, Hielke ;
Jensen, Paul H. ;
Webster, Elizabeth .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2010, 62 (02) :261-285
[6]   Financing Constraints and the Cost of Capital: Evidence from the Funding of Corporate Pension Plans [J].
Campbell, John L. ;
Dhaliwal, Dan S. ;
Schwartz, William C., Jr. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2012, 25 (03) :868-912
[7]   In Search of Distress Risk [J].
Campbell, John Y. ;
Hilscher, Jens ;
Szilagyi, Jan .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 63 (06) :2899-2939
[8]   The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures [J].
Chan, LKC ;
Lakonishok, J ;
Sougiannis, T .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2001, 56 (06) :2431-2456
[9]   Is Default Risk Negatively Related to Stock Returns? [J].
Chava, Sudheer ;
Purnanandam, Amiyatosh .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2010, 23 (06) :2523-2559
[10]   Financial reporting quality, debt maturity and investment efficiency [J].
Cutillas Gomariz, Ma Fuensanta ;
Sanchez Ballesta, Juan Pedro .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2014, 40 :494-506