Comparison of NOx prediction methodologies for gas turbine combustor simulations

被引:0
作者
Deur, JM [1 ]
Jonnavithula, S
Meeks, E
Rupley, F
机构
[1] Anal & Design Applicat Co Ltd, Melville, NY 11747 USA
[2] React Design, San Diego, CA USA
来源
35TH INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT (IECEC), VOLS 1 AND 2, TECHNICAL PAPERS | 2000年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Requirements to reduce the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from gas turbines used in aircraft propulsion and stationary power generation have led to consideration of several low-emission combustor concepts, e.g., lean premixed/prevaporized (LPP), lean direct injection (LDI), and rich burn/quick mix/lean burn (RQL). As part of the engineering research, design, and development of these combustors, multi-dimensional combustion computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations are increasingly being utilized. To examine the ability of combustion CFD to accurately predict emissions, a series of calculations have been performed with STAR-CD, a general purpose commercial CFD package capable of treating three-dimensional flows with turbulence, sprays, and chemical reactions. Some of the calculations shown in this paper make use of a new coupled n-step chemistry solver combining features of CHEMKIN with STAR-CD which is being developed jointly by Reaction Design and adapco. The NOx predictions are made via two techniques. In the first, a joint scalar PPDF thermal NOx postprocessor is employed in conjunction with a two-step combined timescale combustion model. In the second approach, a reduced 26-step finite rate kinetics mechanism is utilized. Here, the combustion chemistry is combined with the NOx formation chemistry based on the extended Zel'dovich mechanism for thermal NOx and a surrogate species approach for prompt NOx. Comparisons to experimental data show that both approaches can produce reasonable predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:1126 / 1136
页数:11
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
ANDERSON DN, 1975, NASATMX71592
[2]  
BIRKBY P, 2000, 2000GT131 ASME
[3]  
DEUR JM, 1994, 942895CP AIAA
[4]  
Kundu K., 1998, 983986 AIAA
[5]  
MECURE RA, 2000, 2000GT12 ASME
[6]  
MONGIA HC, 1979, USARTLTR7855A55B55C
[7]  
VALACHOVIC TG, 1993, 1993GT000 ASME
[8]  
VANDERVORT CL, 2000, 200GT86 ASME
[9]   CHEMICAL KINETIC MODELING OF HYDROCARBON COMBUSTION [J].
WESTBROOK, CK ;
DRYER, FL .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 1984, 10 (01) :1-57
[10]  
WESTBROOK CK, 1999, METHODOLOGY STAR CD