Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis of Ovarian Cancer Outcomes from the Middle Eastern Republic of Georgia

被引:0
|
作者
Vardiashvili, Nino [1 ]
McKenzie, Nathalie D. [2 ]
Ahmad, Sarfraz [2 ]
Todua, Irakli [1 ]
Qoiava, Levan [1 ]
Giorgadze, Tamar [1 ]
Matcharashvili, Mariam [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Ctr Innova, St 6,0179, GE-1009 Tbilisi, Georgia
[2] AdventHlth Canc Inst, Gynecol Oncol Program, Orlando, FL 32804 USA
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Neoadjuvant treatment; Primary debulking surgery; Centralized cancer care; Low-to-middle-income country; SCORPION trail; Comparative analysis; Survival; PRIMARY SURGERY; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s40944-022-00618-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose Ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis and management is challenging in any country; however, in Middle Eastern Republic of Georgia (MEROG), limited resources pose additional challenges. Our surgical goal mirrors international goals of cytoreduction to no gross residual disease (R0). We used international SCORPION trial results as a benchmark for historical contextual comparison. Methods Single institutional retrospective data were collected at Medical Center Innova (MCI), Tbilisi, Georgia. All consecutive stages I-IV OC patients (n = 107) received care by single medical oncologist and single surgical group during 2016-2020. Two treatment strategies were employed: Group A [n = 29, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)] received neoadjuvant three cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 5-6 IV day 1, followed by interval cytoreductive surgery and three additional cycles of chemotherapy. Group B cases [n = 78, primary debulking surgery (PDS)] received upfront surgery and six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy same scheme. Results Of the 107 OC cases treated, 95 (88%) patients were diagnosed at late stage. Mean age in our cohort was similar (57 year; range 22-80) as compared to SCORPION cohort. Most cases (92%) were high-grade serous OC. Twenty-nine cases (27%) received NACT, and R0 resection rate in this group was 86%. Seventy-eight women (72%) had upfront surgery with an R0 rate of 82%. Conclusions The R0 rates in our MEROG are comparable to/better than SCORPION trail results for the treatment strategies [upfront surgery group (82 vs.47%) and neoadjuvant group (86 vs.77%)]. The outcomes of patients with advanced-stage OC treated in low-resource/middle-income country (Georgia) are comparable to the broader European experience.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Combined Statistical Analysis of Glioblastoma Outcomes-A Neurosurgical Single-Institution Retrospective Study
    Tataranu, Ligia Gabriela
    Staicu, Georgiana Adeline
    Dricu, Anica
    Turliuc, Serban
    Paunescu, Dan
    Kamel, Amira
    Rizea, Radu Eugen
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (08):
  • [12] Adjuvant Therapy in Stage III Endometrial Cancer Treatment Outcomes and Survival. A Single-Institution Retrospective Study
    Kuku, Stephanie
    Williams, Matt
    McCormack, Mary
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (06) : 1056 - 1064
  • [13] Diagnosis and management of breast lymphoma: a single-institution retrospective analysis
    Orlandi, Armando
    Sanchez, Alejandro Martin
    Calegari, Maria Alessandra
    D'Archi, Sabatino
    Santoro, Angela
    Di Leone, Alba
    Mule, Antonio
    Arena, Vincenzo
    Masetti, Riccardo
    Barone, Carlo
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 7 : S272 - S280
  • [14] LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF IMRT FOR BREAST CANCER: A SINGLE-INSTITUTION COHORT ANALYSIS
    McDonald, Mark W.
    Godette, Karen D.
    Butker, Elizabeth K.
    Davis, Lawrence W.
    Johnstone, Peter A. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (04): : 1031 - 1040
  • [15] Retrospective analysis of gastric cancer management in a real-world setting: a single-institution experience
    Monti, Manlio
    Massa, Ilaria
    Foca, Flavia
    Morgagni, Paolo
    Framarini, Massimo
    Passardi, Alessandro
    Falcini, Fabio
    Frassineti, Giovanni Luca
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2020, 106 (02): : 165 - 171
  • [16] Olaparib for ovarian cancer: a single-institution, multi-site qualitative study
    Martin, Nichole A.
    Hanna, Mina
    Ehret, Christopher
    Asiedu, Gladys
    Jatoi, Aminah
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (06) : 4807 - 4812
  • [17] Secondary Laparoscopic Cytoreduction in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Large, Single-Institution Experience
    Gallotta, Valerio
    Conte, Carmine
    Giudice, Maria Teresa
    Nero, Camilla
    Vizzielli, Giuseppe
    Alletti, Salvatore Gueli
    Cianci, Stefano
    Lodoli, Claudio
    Di Giorgio, Andrea
    De Rose, Agostino Maria
    Fagotti, Anna
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ferrandina, Gabriella
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (04) : 644 - 650
  • [18] Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and Capecitabine for Primary Platinum-Resistant or Platinum-Refractory Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Results of a Retrospective, Single-Institution Study
    Sayal, Karen
    Gounaris, Ioannis
    Basu, Bristi
    Freeman, Sue
    Moyle, Penny
    Hosking, Karen
    Iddawela, Mahesh
    Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes
    Abraham, Jean
    Brenton, James
    Hatcher, Helen
    Earl, Helena
    Parkinson, Christine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (06) : 977 - 984
  • [19] Olaparib for ovarian cancer: a single-institution, multi-site qualitative study
    Nichole A. Martin
    Mina Hanna
    Christopher Ehret
    Gladys Asiedu
    Aminah Jatoi
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 4807 - 4812
  • [20] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience and a Review of the Literature
    Loizzi, Vera
    Leone, Luca
    Camporeale, Anna
    Resta, Leonardo
    Selvaggi, Luigi
    Cicinelli, Ettore
    Cormio, Gennaro
    ONCOLOGY, 2016, 91 (04) : 211 - 216