Newton and action at a distance between bodies-A response to Andrew Janiak's "Three concepts of causation in Newton"

被引:3
作者
Henry, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sci Studies Unit, Edinburgh EH1 1LZ, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE | 2014年 / 47卷
关键词
Andrew Janiak; Isaac Newton; Action at a distance; Force; Gravity; Substance;
D O I
10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.03.001
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
This article responds to Professor Andrew Janiak's recent attempt to defend the proposition that Isaac Newton did not believe in action at a distance between bodies (or any other kind of substance) (Janiak, 2013). His argument rests on a distinction between "three concepts of causation in Newton", which leads him to conclude that although Newton did not believe in action at a distance between bodies, he was able to accept that gravity was a "distant action". I critically examine Janiak's arguments here, and the historical evidence he brings to bear upon it, and argue that Professor Janiak's latest claims do nothing to undermine the view to which he is opposed, namely, that Newton did believe in the possibility of action at a distance between bodies. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 97
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Alexander H. G., 1956, LEIBNIZ CLARKE CORRE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Newton as philosopher
  • [3] Biener Zvi., 2012, INTERPRETING NEWTON, P105
  • [4] Casini Paolo, 1984, History of Science, V22, P1
  • [5] Disalle R., 2002, The Cambridge Companion to Newton, P33
  • [6] Henry J., 2007, ESTUDIOS FILOSOFIA, V35, P189
  • [7] Gravity and De gravitatione: the development of Newton's ideas on action at a distance
    Henry, John
    [J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2011, 42 (01): : 11 - 27
  • [8] Henry John., 1994, BOOKS NATURE SCRIPTU, P123
  • [9] Henry John., 1999, KRISIS PHILOS REV, V8, P30
  • [10] Three concepts of causation in Newton
    Janiak, Andrew
    [J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2013, 44 (03): : 396 - 407