Which cephalosporin for gonorrhoea?

被引:16
作者
Ison, CA
Mouton, JW
Jones, K
Fenton, KA
Livermore, DM
机构
[1] Hlth Protect Agcy, Specialist & Reference Microbiol Div, Sexually Transmitted Bacteria Reference Lab, London NW9 5HT, England
[2] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp C70, Dept Med Microbiol & Infect Dis, NL-6532 SZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Sexual Hlth & HIV Res, London WC13 6AU, England
[4] Hlth Protect Agcy, Ctr Communicable Dis Surveillance, London NW9 5EQ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/sti.2004.012757
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The recommended treatment for gonorrhoea in the United Kingdom has, until recently, included the fluoroquinolone, ciprofloxacin, which consequently was used by most genitourinary medicine clinics. In 2002 national surveillance data showed that resistance to ciprofloxacin had risen to a prevalence of 9.8% (9% in 2003), indicating that the target of >95% efficacy in first line therapy was no longer achievable. The third generation cephalosporins, ceftriaxone (intramuscular) or cefixime ( oral), are the recommended alternatives, but recent audit data reveal other cephalosporins are currently being used to treat gonorrhoea, notably including cefuroxime ( intramuscular or, often, oral). A pharmacodynamic analysis was undertaken to determine whether all these regimens were equally potent. Ceftriaxone, 250 ( or 500) mg intramuscularly, or cefixime, 400 mg orally, were calculated to give free drug concentrations above the MIC90 for 22-50 hours post dose whereas the cefuroxime regimens being used were pharmacodynamically borderline, achieving this target for only 6.8-11.2 hours and raising the spectre that continued use may select for stepwise increases in resistance, as occurred with penicillin. We therefore underscore that ceftriaxone or cefixime should be the agents of choice to replace ciprofloxacin, as recommended in the new treatment guidelines, and that cefuroxime is a poor substitute.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 388
页数:3
相关论文
共 22 条