Incorporating uncertainty from downscaled rainfall projections into climate resilience planning in US cities

被引:5
作者
Lopez-Cantu, Tania [1 ,2 ]
Webber, Marissa K. [1 ]
Samaras, Constantine [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 USA
[2] Esri, 380 New York St, Redlands, CA 92373 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH: INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY | 2022年 / 2卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
climate change; adaptation plans; resilience; downscaled climate data; extreme precipitation; cities; uncertainty; CHANGE ADAPTATION; INFORMATION; JUSTICE; EQUITY; INFRASTRUCTURE; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS; CURVES; TRENDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1088/2634-4505/ac8a6c
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The planning, design, and maintenance of stormwater infrastructure must be informed by changing rainfall patterns due to climate change. However, there is little consensus on how future climate information should be used, or how uncertainties introduced by use of different methods and datasets should be characterized or managed. These uncertainties exacerbate existing challenges to using climate information on local or municipal scales. Here we analyze major cities in the U.S., 48 of which developed climate adaptation and resilience plans. Given the prevalence of depth duration frequency (DDF) curves for planning infrastructure for rainfall, we then assessed the underlying climate information used in these 48 plans to show how DDF curves used for resilience planning and the resulting outcomes can be affected by stakeholders' methodological choices and datasets. For rainfall extremes, many resilience plans varied by trend detection method, data preprocessing steps, and size of study area, and all used only one of the available downscaled climate projection datasets. We evaluate the implications of uncertainties across five available climate datasets and show the level of climate resilience to extreme rainfall depends on the dataset selected for each city. We produce risk matrices for a broader set of 77 U.S. cities to highlight how local resilience strategies and decisions are sensitive to the climate projection dataset used in local adaptation plans. To help overcome barriers to using climate information, we provide an open dataset of future daily rainfall values for 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100 years annual recurrence intervals for 77 cities and compare resilience outcomes across available climate datasets that each city can use for comparison and for robust resilience planning. Because of uncertainty in climate projections, our results highlight the importance of no-regret and flexible resilience strategies that can be adjusted with new climate information.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Comparing urban coastal flood risk in 136 cities under two alternative sea-level projections: RCP 8.5 and an expert opinion-based high-end scenario [J].
Abadie, Luis M. ;
Jackson, Luke P. ;
de Murieta, Elisa Sainz ;
Jevrejeva, Svetlana ;
Galarraga, Ibon .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 193
[2]   A comparison of statistical downscaling methods suited for wildfire applications [J].
Abatzoglou, John T. ;
Brown, Timothy J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2012, 32 (05) :772-780
[3]   Equity Impacts of Urban Land Use Planning for Climate Adaptation: Critical Perspectives from the Global North and South [J].
Anguelovski, Isabelle ;
Shi, Linda ;
Chu, Eric ;
Gallagher, Daniel ;
Goh, Kian ;
Lamb, Zachary ;
Reeve, Kara ;
Teicher, Hannah .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (03) :333-348
[4]   Climate change adaptation planning in large cities: A systematic global assessment [J].
Araos, Malcolm ;
Berrang-Ford, Lea ;
Ford, James D. ;
Austin, Stephanie E. ;
Biesbroek, Robbert ;
Lesnikowski, Alexandra .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 66 :375-382
[5]  
Bartos MD, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P748, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2648, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2648]
[6]   Twenty priorities for future social-ecological research on climate resilience [J].
Beauchamp, Emilie ;
Hirons, Mark ;
Brown, Katrina ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (10)
[7]   A comprehensive review of climate adaptation in the United States: more than before, but less than needed [J].
Bierbaum, Rosina ;
Smith, Joel B. ;
Lee, Arthur ;
Blair, Maria ;
Carter, Lynne ;
Chapin, F. Stuart, III ;
Fleming, Paul ;
Ruffo, Susan ;
Stults, Missy ;
McNeeley, Shannon ;
Wasley, Emily ;
Verduzco, Laura .
MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2013, 18 (03) :361-406
[8]   Overcoming barriers during the co-production of climate information for decision-making [J].
Briley, Laura ;
Brown, Daniel ;
Kalafatis, Scott E. .
CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, 9 :41-49
[9]   Contesting climate justice in the city: Examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments [J].
Bulkeley, Harriet ;
Edwards, Gareth A. S. ;
Fuller, Sara .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 25 :31-40
[10]   Infrastructure resilience to navigate increasingly uncertain and complex conditions in the Anthropocene [J].
Chester, Mikhail ;
Underwood, B. Shane ;
Allenby, Braden ;
Garcia, Margaret ;
Samaras, Constantine ;
Markolf, Samuel ;
Sanders, Kelly ;
Preston, Benjamin ;
Miller, Thaddeus R. .
NPJ URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 1 (01)