What foods are identified as animal friendly by Italian consumers?

被引:30
作者
Di Pasquale, Jorgelina [1 ]
Nannoni, Eleonora [1 ]
Del Duca, Isabella [1 ]
Adinolfi, Felice [1 ]
Capitanio, Fabian [2 ]
Sardi, Luca [1 ]
Vitali, Marika [1 ]
Martelli, Giovanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dipartimento Sci Med Vet, I-40064 Ozzano Dellemilia, BO, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Dipartimento Agr, Portici, NA, Italy
关键词
Consumers' attitude; Survey; Animal welfare; Willingness to pay; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; WELFARE; SAFETY; CONSUMPTION; CHALLENGES; PERCEPTION; PREFERENCE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.4081/ijas.2014.3582
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In the Italian market, voluntary certifications implying higher levels of animal welfare generally fall into wider production schemes. Despite of the results of EU surveys indicating that about 50% of Italian consumers can easily identify and find animal-friendly products, they still are distributed scarcely or discontinuously in the main retail chains. To assess the apparent contradiction between the intricate information consumers receive from labels and their declared awareness about animal welfare, a survey was conducted in Emilia Romagna region on 355 Italian consumers (face-to-face interviews based on a structured, semi-close-ended questionnaire). Overall, consumers showed a low degree of knowledge about animal welfare attributes, animal farming conditions and animal protection policies (about 30% of correct answers), and a low level of awareness of the effects of their purchasing choices on the welfare of farmed animals (22%). The respondents also showed difficulties in identifying animal-friendly products and often confused them with other certified foods, having sometimes a weak connection (or none at all) to animal welfare (e.g., Protected Designation of Origin products). However, most consumers declared to be ready to pay a premium price in name of animal welfare. In conclusion, a labelling system for the welfare content of animal-derived foods is confirmed to be an effective strategy to compensate the efforts of farmers in improving animal welfare, provided that the information given is clear and able to fill the substantial lack of consumer knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 789
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Official Journal L, V182, P19
[2]  
[Anonymous], ATT CONS WELF FARM A
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, INT J SOCIOL AGR FOO, DOI DOI 10.48416/IJSAF.V15I3.284
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Official Journal of the European Union, V221, P23
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Off. J. Eur. Union, V10, P7
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1965, Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Official Journal of the European Communities no. L, V203, P53
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Welfare Quality Reports
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ATT EU CIT AN WELF
[10]  
Averos Xavier, 2013, Animals (Basel), V3, P786, DOI 10.3390/ani3030786