Sovereign issuers, incentives and liquidity: The case of the Danish sovereign bond market

被引:3
作者
Eisl, Alexander [1 ]
Ochs, Christian [1 ]
Staghoj, Jonas [2 ]
Subrahmanyam, Marti G. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] WU Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Dept Finance Accounting & Stat, Welthandelspl 1, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
[2] Danmarks Nationalbank, Dept Govt Debt Management Banking & Markets, Havnegade 5, DK-1093 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] NYU, Stern Sch Business, Dept Finance, 44 West Fourth St, New York, NY 10012 USA
[4] NYU Shanghai, 44 West Fourth St, New York, NY 10012 USA
关键词
Market liquidity; Sovereign bond markets; Dealer incentives; SPREADS; PRICE; ILLIQUIDITY; MAKERS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106485
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The Sovereign Debt Management Office of the Kingdom of Denmark decided in 2017 to pay direct compensation to certain financial intermediaries for providing liquidity in its sovereign bond market. We analyze the extent to which market liquidity and liquidity premia in the Danish sovereign bond market changed in response to this new market design and, in particular, the compensation offered to liquidity providers. We also investigate whether the new compensation scheme for market makers is cost-efficient for the Kingdom of Denmark through lower bond liquidity premia, bond yields and debt service costs. We find that improvements in market liquidity conditions lead to potential savings, net of costs, for the Kingdom of Denmark of DKK 23.12 million over the lifetime of the bonds issued every year as a direct benefit, and to a decrease in interest expenses for the real economy of about 0 . 07% of nominal GDP as one indirect benefit. From these findings, we derive policy recommendations for the Kingdom of Denmark, as well as other European countries that currently generally employ an indirect rather than a direct compensation scheme.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modelling illiquidity spillovers with Hawkes processes: an application to the sovereign bond market
    Schneider, M.
    Lillo, F.
    Pelizzon, L.
    QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2018, 18 (02) : 283 - 293
  • [22] Sovereign bond market integration in the euro area: a new empirical conceptualization
    Dufrenot, Gilles
    Jawadi, Fredj
    Ftiti, Zied
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 318 (01) : 147 - 161
  • [23] Credit default swaps and the market for sovereign debt
    Ismailescu, Iuliana
    Phillips, Blake
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2015, 52 : 43 - 61
  • [24] The Market Impact of Relative Agency Activity in the Sovereign Ratings Market
    Hill, Paula
    Faff, Robert
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2010, 37 (9-10) : 1309 - 1347
  • [25] How do oil prices affect emerging market sovereign bond spreads?
    Chen, Shiu-Sheng
    Huang, Shiangtsz
    Lin, Tzu-Yu
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2022, 128
  • [26] Liquidity and credit premia in the yields of highly-rated sovereign bonds
    Ejsing, Jacob
    Grothe, Magdalena
    Grothe, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2015, 33 : 160 - 173
  • [27] Do primary dealer funding constraints impact sovereign bond liquidity and yields: evidence for nine Euro area countries
    Ferrari, Massimo
    Stolz, Stephanie
    Wedow, Michael
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 56 (06) : 1855 - 1891
  • [28] Emerging market sovereign bond spreads, credit ratings and global financial crisis
    Ozmen, Erdal
    Yasar, Ozge Doganay
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2016, 59 : 93 - 101
  • [29] Assessing the role of ESG evaluation in market risk management for sovereign bond investments
    Hasegawa, Kento
    Higuchi, Hiroyuki
    Kitajima, Kiichi
    Komaru, Yasuhiro
    Suda, Shintaro
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE & INVESTMENT, 2025, 15 (01) : 77 - 104
  • [30] Sovereign bond return prediction with realized higher moments
    Kinateder, Harald
    Papavassiliou, Vassilios G.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2019, 62 : 53 - 73