Barriers and enablers to consumer and community involvement in research and healthcare improvement: Perspectives from consumer organisations, health services and researchers in Melbourne, Australia

被引:28
作者
Ayton, Darshini [1 ,2 ]
Braaf, Sandra [1 ]
Jones, Angela [1 ]
Teede, Helena [1 ,3 ]
Gardam, Madeleine [4 ]
Bergmeier, Heidi [2 ]
Skouteris, Helen [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Monash Partners Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Hlth & Social Care Unit, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Monash Ctr Hlth Res & Implementat, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Consumer, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
community participation; health services research; patient experience and public involvement; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1111/hsc.13515
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Partnering with consumers and patients and the community and public is a research and healthcare improvement imperative. Consumer and community involvement (CCI) requires behaviour change at the individual (researcher, health professional, manager), organisational (health service, university, medical research institute) and system level (funding policies, collaboration between organisations). To understand the barriers and enablers to meaningful CCI, a qualitative descriptive study was undertaken with researchers, health professionals, representatives from consumer organisations, and health services and ethics committees in Melbourne, Australia. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews and one focus group were conducted in May-August 2019. Ethics approval was obtained. Thematic analysis was guided by the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation and Behaviour model (COM-B). Training of researchers and health professionals in CCI, benefits and systems and processes to undertake CCI, alongside incorporating CCI as a requirement for funding were identified as enablers. Lack of time and resources for CCI, challenges in finding consumers for projects and a perceived lack of evidence of the impact of CCI were barriers. These identified barriers and enablers will inform strategies to build the capacity of CCI at the individual, organisation and system level within the Australian Health Research Alliance.
引用
收藏
页码:E1078 / E1091
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards [J].
Raksha Pandya-Wood ;
Duncan S. Barron ;
Jim Elliott .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 3 (1)
[22]  
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, 2019, ENG US
[23]  
PCORI, 2017, M EV
[24]  
Saldana J., 2010, CODING MANUAL QUALIT
[25]   ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research [J].
Staley K. .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 1 (1)
[26]  
Staniszewska S, 2017, BMJ, V358, pj3453, DOI [10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2, 10.1136/bmj.j3453]
[27]   Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future [J].
Staniszewska, Sophie ;
Denegri, Simon ;
Matthews, Rachel ;
Minogue, Virginia .
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (07)
[28]   Research Involvement and Engagement: reflections so far and future directions [J].
Richard Stephens ;
Sophie Staniszewska .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 3 (1)
[29]  
Teede H., 2018, INSIGHT 1015
[30]   Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study [J].
Vaismoradi, Mojtaba ;
Turunen, Hannele ;
Bondas, Terese .
NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2013, 15 (03) :398-405