Barriers and enablers to consumer and community involvement in research and healthcare improvement: Perspectives from consumer organisations, health services and researchers in Melbourne, Australia

被引:28
作者
Ayton, Darshini [1 ,2 ]
Braaf, Sandra [1 ]
Jones, Angela [1 ]
Teede, Helena [1 ,3 ]
Gardam, Madeleine [4 ]
Bergmeier, Heidi [2 ]
Skouteris, Helen [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Monash Partners Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Hlth & Social Care Unit, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Monash Ctr Hlth Res & Implementat, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Consumer, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
community participation; health services research; patient experience and public involvement; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1111/hsc.13515
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Partnering with consumers and patients and the community and public is a research and healthcare improvement imperative. Consumer and community involvement (CCI) requires behaviour change at the individual (researcher, health professional, manager), organisational (health service, university, medical research institute) and system level (funding policies, collaboration between organisations). To understand the barriers and enablers to meaningful CCI, a qualitative descriptive study was undertaken with researchers, health professionals, representatives from consumer organisations, and health services and ethics committees in Melbourne, Australia. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews and one focus group were conducted in May-August 2019. Ethics approval was obtained. Thematic analysis was guided by the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation and Behaviour model (COM-B). Training of researchers and health professionals in CCI, benefits and systems and processes to undertake CCI, alongside incorporating CCI as a requirement for funding were identified as enablers. Lack of time and resources for CCI, challenges in finding consumers for projects and a perceived lack of evidence of the impact of CCI were barriers. These identified barriers and enablers will inform strategies to build the capacity of CCI at the individual, organisation and system level within the Australian Health Research Alliance.
引用
收藏
页码:E1078 / E1091
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Nvivo
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Developing training and support for public involvement in research
[3]  
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2019, NAT SAF QUAL HLTH SE
[4]  
Braaf S., INTERN MED J
[5]  
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2019, Research Centre for Patient Involvement
[6]   Models and frameworks of patient engagement in health services research: A scoping review protocol [J].
Chudyk A.M. ;
Waldman C. ;
Horrill T. ;
Demczuk L. ;
Shimmin C. ;
Stoddard R. ;
Hickes S. ;
Schultz A.S.H. .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 4 (1)
[7]   Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study [J].
Crocker, Joanna C. ;
Boylan, Anne-Marie ;
Bostock, Jennifer ;
Locock, Louise .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (03) :519-528
[8]   Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha ;
Hinton, Lisa ;
Finlay, Teresa ;
Macfarlane, Alastair ;
Fahy, Nick ;
Clyde, Ben ;
Chant, Alan .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2019, 22 (04) :785-801
[9]   Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the east midlands: Creating, delivering and evaluating the lay assessor training programme [J].
Horobin A. ;
Brown G. ;
Higton F. ;
Vanhegan S. ;
Wragg A. ;
Wray P. ;
Walker D.-M. .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 3 (1)
[10]  
INVOLVE, 2019, PUBL REV NAT I HLTH