The ALCCaS Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer

被引:42
作者
McCombie, Andrew M. [1 ]
Frizelle, Frank [1 ]
Bagshaw, Philip Frederick [1 ]
Frampton, Chris M. [2 ]
Hewett, Peter J. [3 ,4 ]
McMurrick, Paul John [5 ,6 ]
Rieger, Nicholas [3 ,4 ]
Solomon, Michael J. [7 ]
Stevenson, Andrew R. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Surg, POB 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Div Surg, Woodville South, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Malvern, Vic, Australia
[6] Cabrini Hosp, Malvern, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Sydney, Surg Outcomes Res Ctr SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Colon & Rectal Surg, Herston, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Colonic resection; Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopic; Quality of life; Randomized controlled trial; OPEN SURGICAL TREATMENTS; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OPEN SURGERY; RECTAL-CANCER; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001165
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: This study reports the quality-of-life assessment of the ALCCaS trial. The ALCCaS trial compared laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. It reported equivalence of survival at 5 years. Quality of life was measured as a secondary outcome. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report on the quality of life data of the ALCCaS Trial. DESIGN: This study reports a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic with open colonic resection. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in Australasia. PATIENTS: Patients with a single adenocarcinoma of the right, left, or sigmoid colon, presenting for elective treatment, were eligible for randomization. INTERVENTIONS: Open and laparoscopic colonic resections were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient symptoms and quality of life were measured using the Symptoms Distress Scale, the Quality of Life Index, and the Global Quality of Life Score preoperatively, and at 2 days, 2 weeks, and 2 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 592 patients enrolled in ALCCaS, 425 completed at least 1 quality-of-life measure at 4 time points (71.8% of cohort). Those who received the laparoscopic intervention had better quality of life postoperatively in terms of the Symptoms Distress Scale (p < 0.01), Quality of Life Index (p < 0.01), and Global Quality of Life (p < 0.01). In intention-to-treat analyses, those assigned to laparoscopic surgery had a better quality of life postoperatively in terms of the Symptoms Distress Scale (p < 0.01) and Quality of Life Index (p < 0.01), whereas Global Quality of Life was not significant (p = 0.056). The subscales better for laparoscopic resection at all 3 postoperative time points were appetite, insomnia, pain, fatigue, bowel, daily living, and health (p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: The primary limitation was the different response rates for the 3 quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSIONS: There was a short-term gain in quality of life maintained at 2 months postsurgery for those who received laparoscopic relative to open colonic resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A691.
引用
收藏
页码:1156 / 1162
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Quality of Life Following Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) Versus Open Stoppa Inguinal Hernioplasty
    Kushwaha, Jitendra K.
    Enny, Loreno E.
    Anand, Akshay
    Sonkar, Abhinav A.
    Kumar, Awanish
    Pahwa, Harvinder S.
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (04) : 257 - 261
  • [22] Cost comparison of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy in colon cancer
    Fitch, Kathryn
    Bochner, Andrew
    Keller, Deborah S.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2017, 33 (07) : 1215 - 1221
  • [23] Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized trial
    Ng, Simon S. M.
    Lee, Janet F. Y.
    Yiu, Raymond Y. C.
    Li, Jimmy C. M.
    Hon, Sophie S. F.
    Mak, Tony W. C.
    Ngo, Dennis K. Y.
    Leung, Wing Wa
    Leung, Ka Lau
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (01): : 297 - 306
  • [24] Institutional variation in survival and morbidity in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: From the data of a randomized controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic surgery (JCOG0404)
    Katayama, Hiroshi
    Inomata, Masafumi
    Mizusawa, Junki
    Nakamura, Kenichi
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    Akagi, Tomonori
    Yamamoto, Seiichiro
    Ito, Masaaki
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    Okajima, Masazumi
    Takemasa, Ichiro
    Okuda, Junji
    Shida, Dai
    Kanemitsu, Yukihide
    Kitano, Seigo
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 5 (06): : 823 - 831
  • [25] The Radical Extent of lymphadenectomy-D2 dissection versus complete mesocolic excision of LAparoscopic Right Colectomy for right-sided colon cancer (RELARC) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Lu, Jun-Yang
    Xu, Lai
    Xue, Hua-Dan
    Zhou, Wei-Xun
    Xu, Tao
    Qiu, Hui-Zhong
    Wu, Bin
    Lin, Guo-Le
    Xiao, Yi
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [26] Comparing the safety, efficacy, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy in transverse colon cancer: a meta-analysis
    Baloyiannis, Ioannis
    Perivoliotis, Konstantinos
    Ntellas, Panagiotis
    Dadouli, Katerina
    Tzovaras, George
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 35 (03) : 373 - 386
  • [27] Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a multicenter prospectively randomized controlled trial (LOGICA-trial)
    Haverkamp, Leonie
    Brenkman, Hylke J. F.
    Seesing, Maarten F. J.
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Luyer, Misha D. P.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P.
    Wijnhoven, Bas P. L.
    van Lanschot, Jan J. B.
    de Steur, Wobbe O.
    Hartgrink, Henk H.
    Stoot, Jan H. M. B.
    Hulsewe, Karel W. E.
    Bilgen, Ernst J. Spillenaar
    Rutter, Jeroen E.
    Kouwenhoven, Ewout A.
    van Det, Marc J.
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Daams, Freek
    Draaisma, Werner A.
    Broeders, Ivo A. M. J.
    Van Stel, Henk F.
    Lacle, Miangela M.
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
  • [28] A randomized clinical trial comparing the initial vascular approach to the inferior mesenteric vein versus the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic surgery of rectal cancer and sigmoid colon cancer
    Planellas, Pere
    Salvador, Helena
    Farres, Ramon
    Gomez, Nuria
    Julia, David
    Gil, Julia
    Pujadas, Marcel
    Marinello, Franco
    Cornejo, Lidia
    Codina, Antoni
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (04): : 1310 - 1318
  • [29] Long-Term Outcomes of the Australasian Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Conventional Open Surgical Treatments for Colon Cancer The Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study Trial
    Bagshaw, Philip F.
    Allardyce, Randall A.
    Frampton, Christopher M.
    Frizelle, Francis A.
    Hewett, Peter J.
    McMurrick, Paul J.
    Rieger, Nicholas A.
    Smith, J. Shona
    Solomon, Michael J.
    Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (06) : 915 - 919
  • [30] Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial)
    Bollo, J.
    Turrado, V.
    Rabal, A.
    Carrillo, E.
    Gich, I.
    Martinez, M. C.
    Hernandez, P.
    Targarona, E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (04) : 364 - 372