Evidence for self-cleaning in fluid-based smooth and hairy adhesive systems of insects

被引:56
作者
Clemente, Christofer J. [1 ]
Bullock, James M. R. [1 ]
Beale, Andrew [2 ]
Federle, Walter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[2] UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
self-cleaning; contamination; adhesion; locomotion; biomechanics; BIOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS; GECKO ADHESIVE; ATTACHMENT; LOCOMOTION; SURFACE; PADS; MECHANISMS; PROTECTION; BEHAVIOR; CONTACT;
D O I
10.1242/jeb.038232
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Insects possess adhesive organs that allow attachment to diverse surfaces. Efficient adhesion must be retained throughout their lifetime even when pads are exposed to contamination. Many insects groom their adhesive structures, but it is possible that self-cleaning properties also play an important role. We measured attachment forces of insect pads on glass after contamination with microspheres and found that both smooth pads (stick insects: Carausius morosus) and hairy pads (dock beetles: Gastrophysa viridula) exhibit self-cleaning. Contaminated pads recovered high levels of adhesion after only eight simulated steps; this was accompanied by the deposition of spheres. Self-cleaning was strongly enhanced by shear movements, and only beetle pads showed the ability to self-clean during purely perpendicular pull-offs. Hairy pads also self-cleaned more efficiently than smooth pads for both large (45 mu m) and small (1 mu m) particle sizes. However, the beetles' self-cleaning was not superior to smooth pads when contaminated with 10-mu m beads. This limitation of self-cleaning is explained by the coincidence of bead diameter and interseta distance, which caused beads to remain trapped in between setae.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 642
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices [J].
Arzt, E ;
Gorb, S ;
Spolenak, R .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (19) :10603-10606
[2]   Dynamics of geckos running vertically [J].
Autumn, K ;
Hsieh, ST ;
Dudek, DM ;
Chen, J ;
Chitaphan, C ;
Full, RJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 209 (02) :260-272
[3]   Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae [J].
Autumn, Kellar ;
Hansen, Wendy .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 192 (11) :1205-1212
[4]   Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods, (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny [J].
Beutel, RG ;
Gorb, SN .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (04) :177-207
[5]   Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence [J].
Bullock, James M. R. ;
Drechsler, Patrick ;
Federle, Walter .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 211 (20) :3333-3343
[6]   Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance [J].
Drechsler, Patrick ;
Federle, Walter .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 192 (11) :1213-1222
[7]   DO WAXES ON JUVENILE EUCALYPTUS LEAVES PROVIDE PROTECTION FROM GRAZING INSECTS [J].
EDWARDS, PB .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1982, 7 (04) :347-352
[8]   EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS OF QUALITATIVE VARIATION IN GROOMING BEHAVIOR OF HYMENOPTERA (INSECTA) [J].
FARISH, DJ .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1972, 20 (04) :662-676
[9]   Locomotion and adhesion: dynamic control of adhesive surface contact in ants [J].
Federle, W ;
Endlein, T .
ARTHROPOD STRUCTURE & DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 33 (01) :67-75
[10]   Slippery ant-plants and skilful climbers: selection and protection of specific ant partners by epicuticular wax blooms in Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) [J].
Federle, W ;
Maschwitz, U ;
Fiala, B ;
Riederer, M ;
Holldobler, B .
OECOLOGIA, 1997, 112 (02) :217-224