A Prospective Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive Targeted Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

被引:3
作者
Thangarasu, Mathisekaran [1 ]
Jayaprakash, Sanjay Prakash [1 ]
Selvaraj, Nivash [1 ]
Bafna, Sandeep [1 ]
Paul, Rajesh [1 ]
Mahesh, Chandranathan [1 ]
Jain, Nitesh [1 ]
Balakrishnan, Arunkumar [1 ]
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan [1 ]
机构
[1] Apollo Main Hosp, Dept Urol, 21 Greams Lane,Off Greams Rd, Chennai 600006, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY | 2021年 / 13卷
关键词
mpMRI target biopsy; prostate cancer; standard systematic biopsy; cognitive targeted biopsy; FUSION; MRI; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.2147/RRU.S300868
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We present our study, done to identify the diagnostic yield of cognitive targeted biopsy using mpMRI data, to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancers, in a cohort of biopsy and treatment naive men. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, single institutional study, done from September 2018 to March 2020 in 75 biopsy naive men. The patients with 3, 4 and 5 PIRADS scores underwent mpMRI cognitive target biopsy (mpMRI CTB) followed by standard biopsy (SB) in the same setting by two different urologists. Diagnostic yield of biopsy cores, complications, and stage migration of Gleason's grades was analyzed. Results: Out of 75 patients, 34.6% had abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), and the median serum PSA was 10.6 (4.5-20) ng/mL. Total MRI suspicious lesions were 163. Out of 1263 SB cores, 371 cores were positive for cancer (29.35%), and out of 326 mpMRI CTB cores, 120 were positive for cancer (36.8%) (P<0.0001). Histopathological examination (HPE) revealed 88%, 92%, and 100% clinically significant cancers in PIRADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions. SB and mpMRI CTB in combination have better cancer detection yield than either of the modality when used alone (P-<0.0001). Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and grade 4a complication were seen in 47 (62.6%) and three (4%) patients. Conclusion: In biopsy-naive men with suspected prostate cancer and equivocal DRE, the addition of pre-biopsy mpMRI detects greater numbers of people with clinically significant prostate cancer when compared with SB alone. Combining SB with mpMRI CTB has a superior diagnosing ability when compared with either of the biopsy modalities when used alone.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Importance of Malignant Core Length in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Transrectal Prostate Biopsies [J].
Dundar, Gokce ;
Erkan, Anil .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2023, 10 (02) :93-100
[42]   Comparative Study on the Application Value of Transperineal Prostate Combined Biopsy and Transrectal Prostate Systematic Biopsy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Patients with Different PSA Zones [J].
Wang, Hailuo ;
Wang, Hao ;
Gao, Wen ;
Xu, Peng ;
Wang, Jingkai ;
Xu, Hao ;
Pan, Deng ;
Ma, Yuyang ;
Zhang, Ruoran ;
Zhang, Peiyong ;
Pang, Kun .
UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, 22 (01) :37-43
[43]   Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy [J].
Vezelis, Alvydas ;
Platkevicius, Gediminas ;
Kincius, Marius ;
Gumbys, Liutauras ;
Naruseviciute, Ieva ;
Briediene, Ruta ;
Petroska, Donatas ;
Ulys, Albertas ;
Jankevicius, Feliksas .
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (01) :1-10
[44]   Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know. Part 3: Targeted Biopsy [J].
Venderink, Wulphert ;
Bomers, Joyce G. ;
Overduin, Christiaan G. ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
de Lauw, Gijs R. ;
Sedelaar, Michiel J. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (04) :481-490
[45]   Transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate: does it still have a role in prostate cancer diagnosis? [J].
Moe, Andrew ;
Hayne, Dickon .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (06) :3018-3024
[46]   Predictors of prostate cancer on repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy [J].
Park, SJ ;
Miyake, H ;
Hara, I ;
Eto, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 10 (02) :68-71
[47]   Common errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsy The most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer [J].
Enzinger, Benazir ;
Pfitzinger, Paulo Leonardo ;
Ebner, Benedikt ;
Ivanova, Troya ;
Volz, Yannic ;
Apfelbeck, Maria ;
Kazmierczak, Philipp ;
Stief, Christian ;
Chaloupka, Michael .
UROLOGIE, 2023, 62 (05) :479-486
[48]   MRI/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Targeted Biopsy and Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsy for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Xie, Jianfeng ;
Jin, Chunchun ;
Liu, Mengmeng ;
Sun, Kun ;
Jin, Zhanqiang ;
Ding, Zhimin ;
Gong, Xuehao .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[49]   Prospective study comparing ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsy and finger-guided transperineal biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer [J].
Garcia, G ;
Chevallier, D ;
Amiel, J ;
Toubol, J ;
Michiels, JF .
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2001, 11 (01) :40-44
[50]   A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection [J].
Petov, Vladislav ;
Bazarkin, Andrey ;
Morozov, Andrey ;
Taratkin, Mark ;
Ganzha, Timur ;
Danilov, Sergey ;
Chernov, Yaroslav ;
Chinenov, Denis ;
Rzayev, Ramin ;
Suvorov, Alexander ;
Amosov, Alexander ;
Fajkovic, Harun ;
Enikeev, Dmitry ;
Krupinov, German .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (08) :940-947