A Prospective Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive Targeted Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

被引:2
作者
Thangarasu, Mathisekaran [1 ]
Jayaprakash, Sanjay Prakash [1 ]
Selvaraj, Nivash [1 ]
Bafna, Sandeep [1 ]
Paul, Rajesh [1 ]
Mahesh, Chandranathan [1 ]
Jain, Nitesh [1 ]
Balakrishnan, Arunkumar [1 ]
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan [1 ]
机构
[1] Apollo Main Hosp, Dept Urol, 21 Greams Lane,Off Greams Rd, Chennai 600006, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY | 2021年 / 13卷
关键词
mpMRI target biopsy; prostate cancer; standard systematic biopsy; cognitive targeted biopsy; FUSION; MRI; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.2147/RRU.S300868
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We present our study, done to identify the diagnostic yield of cognitive targeted biopsy using mpMRI data, to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancers, in a cohort of biopsy and treatment naive men. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, single institutional study, done from September 2018 to March 2020 in 75 biopsy naive men. The patients with 3, 4 and 5 PIRADS scores underwent mpMRI cognitive target biopsy (mpMRI CTB) followed by standard biopsy (SB) in the same setting by two different urologists. Diagnostic yield of biopsy cores, complications, and stage migration of Gleason's grades was analyzed. Results: Out of 75 patients, 34.6% had abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), and the median serum PSA was 10.6 (4.5-20) ng/mL. Total MRI suspicious lesions were 163. Out of 1263 SB cores, 371 cores were positive for cancer (29.35%), and out of 326 mpMRI CTB cores, 120 were positive for cancer (36.8%) (P<0.0001). Histopathological examination (HPE) revealed 88%, 92%, and 100% clinically significant cancers in PIRADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions. SB and mpMRI CTB in combination have better cancer detection yield than either of the modality when used alone (P-<0.0001). Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and grade 4a complication were seen in 47 (62.6%) and three (4%) patients. Conclusion: In biopsy-naive men with suspected prostate cancer and equivocal DRE, the addition of pre-biopsy mpMRI detects greater numbers of people with clinically significant prostate cancer when compared with SB alone. Combining SB with mpMRI CTB has a superior diagnosing ability when compared with either of the biopsy modalities when used alone.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The efficacy of periprostatic local anaesthetic infiltration in transrectal ultrasound biopsy of prostate: a prospective randomised control study
    Kuppusamy, Shanggar
    Faizal, N.
    Quek, K. F.
    Razack, A. H.
    Dublin, N.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 28 (06) : 673 - 676
  • [22] Robotic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Lim, Sunghwan
    Jun, Changhan
    Chang, Doyoung
    Petrisor, Doru
    Han, Misop
    Stoianovici, Dan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 66 (09) : 2527 - 2537
  • [23] MRI Fusion-Targeted Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and the Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Men
    Tan, Teck Wei
    Png, Keng Siang
    Lee, Chau Hung
    Yuwono, Arianto
    Yeow, Yuyi
    Chong, Kian Tai
    Lee, Yee Mun
    Tan, Cher Heng
    Tan, Yung Khan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (11) : 1111 - 1116
  • [24] Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound targeted biopsy versus standard systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection: results of a prospective cohort study with 1024 patients
    Zhu Yunkai
    Chen Yaqing
    Jiang Jun
    Qi Tingyue
    Liu Weiyong
    Qu Yuehong
    Guan Wenbin
    Wang Lifeng
    Qi Jun
    World Journal of Urology, 2019, 37 : 805 - 811
  • [25] Influence of biopsy cores number performed with targeted prostate biopsy on the likelihood of a positive result in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer
    Zyryanov, A., V
    Gulin, G. A.
    Rubtsova, N. A.
    Mager, V. O.
    Putintsev, A. E.
    Kuznetsova, S. G.
    Kuznetsova, D. D.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2020, 16 (03): : 62 - 69
  • [26] Bimodal imaging: Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer is higher in MRI lesions visible to transrectal ultrasound
    Falkenbach, Fabian
    Ahmad-Sterkau, Fatima
    Kachanov, Mykyta
    Beyersdorff, Dirk
    Koehler, Daniel
    Ambrosini, Francesca
    Ortner, Gernot
    Maurer, Tobias
    Graefen, Markus
    Budaeus, Lars
    PROSTATE, 2024, 84 (16) : 1448 - 1455
  • [27] Ultrasound radiomics model based on grayscale transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for diagnosing prostate cancer and predicting distant metastasis
    Liu, Jie
    Xiang, Zhendong
    Yi, Cheng
    Yang, Tianzi
    Liu, Dongting
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2025, : 1797 - 1809
  • [28] In-bore magnetic resonance-guided transrectal biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Ely R. Felker
    Stephanie A. Lee-Felker
    John Feller
    Daniel J. Margolis
    David S. Lu
    Robert Princenthal
    Stuart May
    Martin Cohen
    Jiaoti Huang
    Jeffrey Yoshida
    Bernadette Greenwood
    Hyun J. Kim
    Steven S. Raman
    Abdominal Radiology, 2016, 41 : 954 - 962
  • [29] Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy
    Fujii, Shinsuke
    Hayashi, Tetsutaro
    Honda, Yukiko
    Terada, Hiroaki
    Akita, Ryuji
    Kitamura, Naoyuki
    Ueda, Eikoh
    Han, Xiangrui
    Ueno, Takeshi
    Miyamoto, Shunsuke
    Kitano, Hiroyuki
    Inoue, Shogo
    Teishima, Jun
    Abdi, Hamidreza
    Awai, Kazuo
    Takeshima, Yukio
    Sentani, Kazuhiro
    Yasui, Wataru
    Matsubara, Akio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [30] Superior detection of significant prostate cancer by transperineal prostate biopsy using MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion image guidance over cognitive registration
    Ito, Masaya
    Yonese, Ichiro
    Toide, Masahiro
    Ikuta, Shuzo
    Kobayashi, Shuichiro
    Koga, Fumitaka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 28 (11) : 1545 - 1553