A Multigranularity Linguistic Group Decision-Making Method Based on Hesitant 2-Tuple Sets

被引:66
作者
Wei, Cuiping [1 ]
Liao, Huchang [2 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Coll Math Sci, Yangzhou 225002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Sch Business, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TERM SETS; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; OWA OPERATORS; MODEL; INFORMATION; WEIGHTS; WORDS;
D O I
10.1002/int.21798
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (HFLTS) is a very useful technology in dealing with decision-making problems where people have hesitancy in providing their linguistic assessments. Distinct methods have been developed to aid decision making with HFLTSs, yet there is little research involving the issue that how to deal with the multigranularity hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. The aim of this paper is to develop the aggregation method for multigranularity hesitant fuzzy linguistic information and solve the linguistic group decision problem with different linguistic term sets. To do so, we first modify the translation functions and aggregation operators in the existing 2-tuple linguistic representation models so as to aggregate linguistic terms from different linguistic term sets. Then, we introduce the notion of hesitant 2-tuple sets to make computation of HFLTSs without loss of information, and develop some new operators to aggregate HFLTSs from different linguistic term sets. Using these operators, we propose a method to deal with multigranularity linguistic group decision-making problems with different situations where importance weights of either criteria or experts are known or unknown. Finally, the multigranularity linguistic group decision-making model is implemented to the healthcare waste treatment in West China Hospital to validate its effectiveness and efficiency in aiding decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 634
页数:23
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Andres R, 2010, SOFT COMPUT, V14, P21
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, P 10 ANN M AS
[3]   TOPSIS for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets [J].
Beg, Ismat ;
Rashid, Tabasam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (12) :1162-1171
[4]  
Bonissone P., 1986, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, P217, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.005
[5]   A novel efficient approach for DFMEA combining 2-tuple and the OWA operator [J].
Chang, Kuei-Hu ;
Wen, Ta-Chun .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (03) :2362-2370
[6]  
Degani R., 1988, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/0888-613X(88)90105-3
[7]   ON AGGREGATION OPERATIONS OF LINGUISTIC LABELS [J].
DELGADO, M ;
VERDEGAY, JL ;
VILA, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 1993, 8 (03) :351-370
[8]   Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators [J].
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Verdegay, JL .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 79 (02) :175-190
[9]   A SEQUENTIAL SELECTION PROCESS IN GROUP DECISION-MAKING WITH A LINGUISTIC ASSESSMENT APPROACH [J].
HERRERA, F ;
HERRERA-VIEDMA, E ;
VERDEGAY, JL .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 1995, 85 (04) :223-239
[10]   Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making [J].
Herrera, F ;
Martínez, L ;
Sánchez, PJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 166 (01) :115-132