Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes

被引:29
作者
Gonzalez-Romero, Stella [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalez-Molero, Inmaculada
Fernandez-Abellan, Micaela [3 ]
Dominguez-Lopez, Marta E.
Ruiz-de-Adana, Soledad [2 ]
Olveira, Gabriel [2 ]
Soriguer, Federico [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Civil, Hosp Reg Univ Carlos Haya, Serv Endocrinol & Nutr, Endocrinol & Nutr Dept, Malaga 29009, Spain
[2] CIBER Diabet & Enfermedades Metab Asociadas, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Reg Univ Carlos Haya, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Malaga, Spain
关键词
CONVENTIONAL INSULIN; PUMP THERAPY; SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION; POPULATION; MELLITUS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1089/dia.2009.0140
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) may be an alternative to multiple daily injections (MDI) in pregestational diabetes during pregnancy. However, no clear improvement in obstetric and perinatal outcome has so far been established for CSII treatment. Methods: In a case-control study, 35 pregnancies treated with CSII and 64 pregnancies treated with MDI treatment were evaluated. Metabolic control and obstetric and perinatal outcome were compared. Results: Women in the CSII group improved their metabolic control (hemoglobin A1c before CSII, 7.83 +/- 0.97%; 3-6 months after, 6.77 +/- 0.61%; P < 0.05). Hemoglobin A1c before pregnancy was lower in the CSII group (6.62 +/- 0.60%) than in the MDI group (7.59 +/- 1.61%) (P < 0.05). No other significant differences, either in metabolic control of diabetes or in obstetric and perinatal outcome, were found. Conclusions: CSII treatment is safe in pregnancy, but it has not yet been associated with any improved pregnancy outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 269
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Cumulative incidence of previous spontaneous abortion in Sweden in 1983-2003: a register study [J].
Adolfsson, Annsofie ;
Larsson, Per-Goeran .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (06) :741-747
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PREGN WOM TYP 1 TYP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, DIAB PREGN AR WE PRO
[4]  
Botta R M, 1986, Minerva Med, V77, P657
[5]  
Boulot P, 2003, DIABETES CARE, V26, P2990
[6]   COMPLICATIONS AND FETAL-OUTCOME IN DIABETIC PREGNANCY - INTENSIFIED CONVENTIONAL VERSUS INSULIN PUMP THERAPY [J].
BURKART, W ;
HANKER, JP ;
SCHNEIDER, HPG .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1988, 26 (02) :104-112
[7]   Spontaneous abortion:: A prospective cohort study of younger women from the general population in Denmark.: Validation, occurrence and risk determinants [J].
Buss, L ;
Tolstrup, J ;
Munk, C ;
Bergholt, T ;
Ottesen, B ;
Gronbæk, M ;
Kjaer, SK .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (04) :467-475
[8]  
CARTA Q, 1986, DIABETES METAB, V12, P121
[9]  
CHEN R, 2007, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V197
[10]   A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF THE INSULIN PUMP VS INTENSIVE CONVENTIONAL THERAPY IN DIABETIC PREGNANCIES [J].
COUSTAN, DR ;
REECE, EA ;
SHERWIN, RS ;
RUDOLF, MCJ ;
BATES, SE ;
SOCKIN, SM ;
HOLFORD, T ;
TAMBORLANE, WV .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 255 (05) :631-636