Can integrating wildlife and livestock enhance ecosystem services in central Kenya?

被引:36
作者
Allan, Brian F. [1 ]
Tallis, Heather [2 ,3 ]
Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca [4 ]
Huckett, Steven [1 ]
Kowal, Virginia A. [4 ]
Musengezi, Jessica [5 ]
Okanga, Sharon [1 ]
Ostfeld, Richard S. [6 ]
Schieltz, Jennifer [7 ]
Warui, Charles M. [8 ,9 ]
Wood, Spencer A. [4 ,10 ]
Keesing, Felicia [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Sch Integrat Biol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Nature Conservancy, Santa Cruz, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Nat Capital Project, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Nature Conservancy, Maitland, FL USA
[6] Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY USA
[7] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[8] Mt Kenya Univ, Sch Pure & Appl Sci, Dept Biol Sci, Thika, Kenya
[9] Karatina Univ, Sch Pure & Appl Sci, Dept Biol Sci, Karatina, Kenya
[10] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[11] Bard Coll, Program Biol, Annandale On Hudson, NY USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TICK-BORNE DISEASES; LAND-USE; PARASITES; CATTLE; CONSERVATION; AFRICA; DIVERSITY; MORTALITY; ABUNDANCE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1002/fee.1501
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Because wildlife and livestock compete for grazing resources, biodiversity conservation and livestock ranching typically have been portrayed as conflicting uses of African savannas. Here, we offer an alternative perspective by describing a savanna ecosystem in central Kenya where wildlife and livestock exhibit a suite of potential positive interactions. For example, treating livestock with an acaricide offers the unintended benefit of removing ticks from the landscape, a result that has now been shown to occur at both large and small scales. When humans derive financial benefits both from wildlife (through tourism) and from livestock (through food production), they may achieve greater economic stability than when income is derived solely from one source. The integrated management of wildlife and livestock can simultaneously improve human health and wildlife conservation. Optimization of human and wildlife benefits will require the management of ecological and socioeconomic trade-offs when conflicts occur between stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 335
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PEOPLE WILDLIFE CONF
[2]   Tick-borne pathogens in the blood of wild and domestic ungulates in South Africa: Interplay of game and livestock [J].
Berggoetz, M. ;
Schmid, M. ;
Ston, D. ;
Wyss, V. ;
Chevillon, C. ;
Pretorius, A. -M. ;
Gern, L. .
TICKS AND TICK-BORNE DISEASES, 2014, 5 (02) :166-175
[3]   Using habitat models to map diversity:: pan-African species richness of ticks (Acari: Ixodida) [J].
Cumming, GS .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2000, 27 (02) :425-440
[4]  
Daily GC, 2011, NATURAL CAPITAL: THEORY & PRACTICE OF MAPPING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, P3
[5]  
Dobson Andy., 1995, Serengeti II: Dynamics, Management and Conservation of an Ecosystem
[6]  
Ericksen Polly, 2012, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V8, P122, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2011.651487
[7]  
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2005, LIV SECT BRIEF KEN
[9]  
Frank L., 2005, People and Wildlife: conflict or Coexistence?
[10]   Conservation outside of parks: Attitudes of local people in Laikipia, Kenya [J].
Gadd, ME .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 32 (01) :50-63