Global DEMs vary from one to another: an evaluation of newly released Copernicus, NASA and AW3D30 DEM on selected terrains of China using ICESat-2 altimetry data

被引:74
作者
Li, Hui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Jiayang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yan, Bingqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yue, Linwei [2 ]
Wang, Lunche [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Geog & Informat Engn, Hunan Key Lab Remote Sensing Ecol Environm Dongti, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Sch Geog & Informat Engn, Key Lab Reg Ecol & Environm Change, 68 Jincheng St, Wuhan 430078, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Geosci, Sch Geog & Informat Engn, Hubei Key Lab Crit Zone Evolut, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Copernicus DEM; NASADEM; vertical accuracy; terrain representation; ICESat-2; altimetry; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS; ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; ASTER GDEM; C-BAND; SRTM; VALIDATION; GENERATION; LIDAR; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1080/17538947.2022.2094002
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
A good understanding of the quality of digital elevation model (DEM) is a perquisite for various applications. This study investigates the accuracy of three most recently released 1-arcsec global DEMs (GDEMs, Copernicus, NASA and AW3D30) in five selected terrains of China, using more than 240,000 high-quality ICESat-2 (Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite) ALT08 points. The results indicate the three GDEMs have similar overall vertical accuracy, with RMSE of 6.73 (Copernicus), 6.59 (NASA) and 6.63 m (AW3D30). While the accuracy varies considerably over study areas and among GDEMs. The results show a clear correlation between the accuracy and terrain slopes, and some relationship between the accuracy and land covers. Our analysis reveals the land cover exerts a greater impact on the accuracy than that of the terrain slope for the study area. Visual inspections of terrain representation indicate Copernicus DEM exhibits the greatest detail of terrain, followed by AW3D30, and then by NASADEM. This study has demonstrated that ICESat-2 altimetry offers an important tool for DEM assessment. The findings provide a timely and comprehensive understanding of the quality of newly released GDEMs, which are informative for the selection of suitable DEMs, and for the improvement of GDEM in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1149 / 1168
页数:20
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]  
Fahrland E., 2020, Copernicus DEM Product Handbook (v4.0), VVolume 2
[12]   The shuttle radar topography mission [J].
Farr, Tom G. ;
Rosen, Paul A. ;
Caro, Edward ;
Crippen, Robert ;
Duren, Riley ;
Hensley, Scott ;
Kobrick, Michael ;
Paller, Mimi ;
Rodriguez, Ernesto ;
Roth, Ladislav ;
Seal, David ;
Shaffer, Scott ;
Shimada, Joanne ;
Umland, Jeffrey ;
Werner, Marian ;
Oskin, Michael ;
Burbank, Douglas ;
Alsdorf, Douglas .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 45 (02)
[13]   Accuracy assessment of the processed SRTM-based elevation data by CGIAR using field data from USA and Thailand and its relation to the terrain characteristics [J].
Gorokhovich, Y. ;
Voustianiouk, A. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 104 (04) :409-415
[14]   Evaluation of TanDEM-X DEMs on selected Brazilian sites: Comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30 [J].
Grohmann, Carlos H. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 212 :121-133
[15]   LiDAR point cloud and ICESat-2 evaluation of 1 second global digital elevation models: Copernicus wins [J].
Guth, Peter L. ;
Geoffroy, Tera M. .
TRANSACTIONS IN GIS, 2021, 25 (05) :2245-2261
[16]   Geomorphometry from SRTM: Comparison to NED [J].
Guth, PL .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 72 (03) :269-277
[17]   Accuracy assessment of the TanDEM-X 90 Digital Elevation Model for selected floodplain sites [J].
Hawker, Laurence ;
Neal, Jeffrey ;
Bates, Paul .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 232
[18]   Perspectives on Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Simulation for Flood Modeling in the Absence of a High-Accuracy Open Access Global DEM [J].
Hawker, Laurence ;
Bates, Paul ;
Neal, Jeffrey ;
Rougier, Jonathan .
FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2018, 6
[19]   An evaluation of lidar-derived elevation and terrain slope in leaf-off conditions [J].
Hodgson, ME ;
Jensen, J ;
Raber, G ;
Tullis, J ;
Davis, BA ;
Thompson, G ;
Schuckman, K .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 71 (07) :817-823
[20]   Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods [J].
Hoehle, Joachim ;
Hoehle, Michael .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 64 (04) :398-406