The agility construct on project management theory

被引:117
作者
Conforto, Edivandro Carlos [1 ]
Amaral, Daniel Capaldo [1 ]
da Silva, Sergio Luis [2 ]
Di Felippo, Ariani [3 ]
Kamikawachi, Dayse Simon L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Ave Trabalhador Sao Carlense,400 Ctr, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, DCI PPGEP, Rod Washington Luis Km 235,Campus Univ, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Language & Literature, Rod Washington Luis Km 235,Campus Univ, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Agility construct; Agility performance; Project management; Agile project management; Frame semantics; SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT; ACHIEVING AGILITY; DESIGN THINKING; MANUFACTURING ORGANIZATIONS; SUCCESS FACTORS; SUPPLY CHAIN; METHODOLOGY; TIME; MULTIVARIATE; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Definitions of agility found in the project management (PM) and agile project management (APM) disciplines are inconsistent, incomplete and lack clarity. This paper presents a complete definition of the agility construct, built from a combination of systematic literature review and frame semantics methodology. A survey with 171 projects with different innovation levels and industry sectors combined with factor analysis was used to first validate the construct. The results show that the agility construct is cohesive and useful in different PM contexts. The implications for advancing the PM theory and practice are threefold: i) agility should be considered a team's performance, rather than a mere adjective for practices and methods; ii) agility, as a performance, might be dependent upon a combination of organization, team and project factors; and iii) the agility performance level can be measured within two main factors: rapid project planning change and active customer involvement. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 674
页数:15
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Adeleye E. O., 2006, International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, V1, P93
[2]  
Amos J. W., 1996, THESIS U TEXAS AUSTI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Agile Manufacturing: A Strategy for the 21st Century
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Factor Analysis.
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Agile project management with Scrum
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CHANGE DESIGN DESIGN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1978, Psychometric theory
[9]  
Ashrafi N., 2005, 7 IEEE INT C E COMM
[10]   ORGANIZATIONAL THEORIES - SOME CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION [J].
BACHARACH, SB .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :496-515