Application of a written scenario to evoke a consumption context in a laboratory setting: Effects on hedonic ratings

被引:63
作者
Hein, Karen A. [1 ]
Hamid, Nazimah [1 ]
Jaeger, Sara R. [2 ]
Delahunty, Conor M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Food Sci, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
[2] Auckland Mail Ctr, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[3] CSIRO, Div Food & Nutr Sci, N Ryde, NSW 1670, Australia
关键词
Context; Consumer; Hedonic rating; Discrimination; Evoked; Laboratory; Sensory; CENTRAL LOCATION TEST; HOME-USE TEST; ACCEPTABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.10.003
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Consumer hedonic testing of products is typically conducted under controlled sensory laboratory conditions. This setting does not accurately represent how food and drink are consumed. Literature demonstrates that consumer hedonic ratings elicited in the natural consumption context differ to those elicited under controlled conditions. This suggests that when removing a product from its natural consumption context, accurate hedonic ratings may not be obtained. The interest of this research was to develop an approach that evokes a consumption context in the sensory laboratory and study its impact on hedonic ratings. A written scenario was developed that was effective at making participants imagine an occasion when they desired a refreshing beverage. Consumer hedonic ratings of four apple juice samples elicited using the evoked consumption context (context condition) were compared to those elicited in a control condition (i.e., no evoked context). Differences in mean hedonic ratings of the samples were observed between the two conditions with greater sample discrimination observed for the evoked context condition. Consumers using the evoked context found it easy to indicate their product liking/disliking, and felt that the liking information they provided was accurate, more so than consumers in the control setting. Sensory practitioners need to be aware of the potential use of an evoked context in a control setting for eliciting product hedonic ratings, and understand its impact on mean hedonic ratings. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 416
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   SITUATIONAL VARIABLES AND CONSUMER-BEHAVIOR [J].
BELK, RW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1975, 2 (03) :157-164
[2]   EFFECTS OF ADDING AN ITALIAN THEME TO A RESTAURANT ON THE PERCEIVED ETHNICITY, ACCEPTABILITY, AND SELECTION OF FOODS [J].
BELL, R ;
MEISELMAN, HL ;
PIERSON, BJ ;
REEVE, WG .
APPETITE, 1994, 22 (01) :11-24
[3]   Comparing central location test and home use test results: Application of a new criterion [J].
Boutrolle, I ;
Arranz, D ;
Rogeaux, M ;
Delarue, J .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2005, 16 (08) :704-713
[4]   Central location test vs. home use test:: Contrasting results depending on product type [J].
Boutrolle, Isabelle ;
Delarue, Julien ;
Arranz, Delphine ;
Rogeaux, Michel ;
Koster, Egon Peter .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2007, 18 (03) :490-499
[5]   Feelings as a basis for discrimination: Comparison of a modified authenticity test with the same-different test for slightly different types of milk [J].
Frandsen, Lise Wolf ;
Dijksterhuis, Garmt B. ;
Brockhoff, Per B. ;
Nielsen, Jacob H. ;
Martens, Magni .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2007, 18 (01) :97-105
[6]   Subtle differences in milk: comparison of an analytical and an affective test [J].
Frandsen, LW ;
Dijksterhuis, G ;
Brockhoff, P ;
Nielsen, JH ;
Martens, M .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (5-6) :515-526
[7]   Understanding consumer perception-of food quality: the cases of shrimps and cheese [J].
Hansen, T .
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2005, 107 (07) :500-525
[8]   Effect of contextual factors on liking for wine -: use of robust design methodology [J].
Hersleth, M ;
Mevik, BH ;
Næs, T ;
Guinard, JX .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (07) :615-622
[9]   Perceptions of meal convenience: the case of at-home evening meals [J].
Jaeger, SR ;
Meiselman, HL .
APPETITE, 2004, 42 (03) :317-325
[10]   Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective [J].
Koster, E. P. .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2009, 20 (02) :70-82