Randomized Trial of Labor Induction in Women 35 Years of Age or Older

被引:173
|
作者
Walker, Kate F. [1 ]
Bugg, George J. [3 ]
Macpherson, Marion [1 ]
McCormick, Carol [1 ]
Grace, Nicky [3 ]
Wildsmith, Chris [4 ]
Bradshaw, Lucy [2 ]
Smith, Gordon C. S. [5 ,6 ]
Thornton, James G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Clin Sci, Div Child Hlth Obstet & Gynaecol, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Clin Trials Unit, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Stillbirth & Neonatal Death Char, London, England
[5] Univ Cambridge, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Cambridge, England
[6] Univ Cambridge, Biomed Res Ctr, Inst Hlth Res, Cambridge, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ADVANCED MATERNAL AGE; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; ELECTIVE INDUCTION; CESAREAN DELIVERY; GESTATIONAL-AGE; RISK; TERM; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1509117
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The risk of antepartum stillbirth at term is higher among women 35 years of age or older than among younger women. Labor induction may reduce the risk of stillbirth, but it also may increase the risk of cesarean delivery, which already is common in this older age group. METHODS We conducted a randomized, controlled trial involving primigravid women who were 35 years of age or older. Women were randomly assigned to labor induction between 39 weeks 0 days and 39 weeks 6 days of gestation or to expectant management (i.e., waiting until the spontaneous onset of labor or until the development of a medical problem that mandated induction). The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. The trial was not designed or powered to assess the effects of labor induction on stillbirth. RESULTS A total of 619 women underwent randomization. In an intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant between-group differences in the percentage of women who underwent a cesarean section (98 of 304 women in the induction group [32%] and 103 of 314 women in the expectant-management group [33%]; relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.14) or in the percentage of women who had a vaginal delivery with the use of forceps or vacuum (115 of 304 women [38%] and 104 of 314 women [33%], respectively; relative risk, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.77). There were no maternal or infant deaths and no significant between-group differences in the women's experience of childbirth or in the frequency of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Among women of advanced maternal age, induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, as compared with expectant management, had no significant effect on the rate of cesarean section and no adverse short-term effects on maternal or neonatal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 822
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of vaginal intercourse on spontaneous labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Castro, Catarina
    Afonso, Maria
    Carvalho, Rui
    Clode, Nuno
    Graca, Luis Mendes
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 290 (06) : 1121 - 1125
  • [32] Mechanical labor induction in the obese population: a secondary analysis of a prospective randomized trial
    Anabusi, Saja
    Mei-Dan, Elad
    Hallak, Mordechai
    Walfisch, Asnat
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (01) : 75 - 80
  • [33] Comparison of cesarean section rates between obstetricians preferring labor induction at early versus late gestational age
    Wu, Liu-Ching
    Peng, Fu-Shaing
    Leung, Cheung
    Lu, Hsin-Fen
    Lin, Ho-Hsiung
    Hsiao, Sheng-Mou
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (05): : 847 - 853
  • [34] Choice of scheduled cesarean delivery versus trial of labor for advanced maternal age primiparous women
    Salman, Lina
    Shmueli, Anat
    Chen, Rony
    Ashwal, Eran
    Hiersch, Liran
    Yogev, Yariv
    Aviram, Amir
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (06) : 979 - 984
  • [35] Activity restriction for women with arrested preterm labor: a randomized controlled trial
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Della Corte, Luigi
    Cuomo, Lara
    Reppuccia, Sabrina
    Murolo, Chiara
    Di Napoli, Federica
    Locci, Mariavittoria
    Bifulco, Giuseppe
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (08)
  • [36] Oral Misoprostol and Vaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate for Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Collingham, Justin P.
    Fuh, Katherine C.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Pullen, Kristin M.
    Lyell, Deirdre J.
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (01) : 121 - 126
  • [37] SMFM Statement on Elective Induction of Labor in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women at Term: the ARRIVE Trial
    Society of Maternal-Fetal Publications Committee
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (01) : B2 - B4
  • [38] Impact of early versus late amniotomy on induction of labor in nulliparous women after vaginally administered misoprostol: A randomized clinical trial
    Anter, Mohamed Elsibai
    Shabbana, Ayman Abd Elkader
    Elhalaby, Alaa Eldin Fatahlla
    Youssif, Hager Abd Elshafy Abd Elfattah
    Elkhouly, Nabih Ibrahim
    REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE, 2021, 5 (03) : 148 - 153
  • [39] Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multi-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial
    Kate F Walker
    George Bugg
    Marion Macpherson
    Carol McCormick
    Chris Wildsmith
    Gordon Smith
    Jim Thornton
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12
  • [40] Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial
    Appadurai, Umadevi
    Gan, Farah
    Hong, Jesrine
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (11)