Active surveillance and surgery in localized prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Kwon, O. [1 ]
Hong, S. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Urol, Songnam 463707, Gyeong Do, South Korea
关键词
prostate cancer; active surveillance; radical prostatectomy; prostate-specific antigen; Gleason score; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; RISK; OUTCOMES; MEN; MANAGEMENT; DELAY; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; MORTALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Prostate Cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed non-cutaneous cancer and also the second leading cause of cancer deaths among men. Concerns about overdiagnosis and over-treatment of PCa have been growing, leading to more conservative approaches, especially in the treatment of low-risk disease. As PCa is a relatively slow-growing tumor, complications of unnecessary curative management in low-risk PCa can be prevented by active surveillance (AS). AS helps to improve quality of life after deferred treatment. Several AS criteria have been suggested for delayed treatment. Although upgrading and/or upstaging of cancer is a limitation of AS, many reports have shown low rates of cancer-specific mortality up to now. Radical prostatectomy (RP) has been considered as standard treatment for prostate cancer to provide good oncologic outcomes. The increasing use of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery, including robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, has contributed to better functional outcomes. So far, long-term randomized studies have not conclusively proven the superiority of either AS or RP. Well-designed long-term randomized studies will be required to compare the benefits of AS and immediate RP. Here, we review recent reports on the current status of AS and RP, including delayed RP, and discuss their merits in the management of localized PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Staerman, F.
    Peyromaure, M.
    Irani, J.
    Gaschignard, N.
    Mottet, N.
    Soulie, M.
    Salomon, L.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2011, 21 (07): : 448 - 454
  • [2] Sexual function with localized prostate cancer: active surveillance vs radical therapy
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Korfage, Ida J.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (07) : 1032 - 1039
  • [3] Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Drouin, S. J.
    Roupret, M.
    Hamdy, F.
    Mottet, N.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2010, 20 : S181 - S185
  • [4] Active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer--A systematic review
    Thomsen, Frederik B.
    Brasso, Klaus
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    Roder, M. Andreas
    Berg, Kasper D.
    Iversen, Peter
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 109 (08) : 830 - 835
  • [5] Use of mpMRI in active surveillance for localized prostate cancer
    Scarpato, Kristen R.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (07) : 320 - 325
  • [6] Treatment of localized prostate cancer: when is active surveillance appropriate?
    Albertsen, Peter C.
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 7 (07) : 394 - 400
  • [7] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    An, Julie Y.
    Sidana, Abhinav
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Ismail Baris
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (05) : 388 - 396
  • [8] Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Overview and Update
    Klotz, Laurence
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (01) : 97 - 108
  • [9] Prostate Cancer and the Increasing Role of Active Surveillance
    Alonzo, David Gabriel
    Mure, Amanda Lynne
    Soloway, Mark S.
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2013, 125 (05) : 109 - 116
  • [10] Active surveillance for prostate cancer: past, present and future
    Singer, Eric A.
    Kaushal, Aradhana
    Turkbey, Baris
    Couvillon, Anna
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Parnes, Howard L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2012, 24 (03) : 243 - 250