Urgent ERCP with pancreatic stent placement or replacement for salvage of post-ERCP pancreatitis

被引:29
作者
Kerdsirichairat, Tossapol [1 ]
Attam, Rajeev [1 ]
Arain, Mustafa [1 ]
Bakman, Yan [1 ]
Radosevich, David [2 ]
Freeman, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; DUCT STENTS; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; NETWORK METAANALYSIS; THERAPEUTIC ERCP; PREVENTION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1055/s-0034-1377750
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: Urgent placement or replacement of pancreatic stents shortly after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) might attenuate the course of evolving post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Patients and methods: Salvage ERCP with de novo pancreatic stent placement or replacement of outwardly migrated stents was performed within 2-48 hours in patients with evolving PEP accompanied by severe pain, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and major elevations in serum amylase and lipase. Serial pain scores, amylase and lipase levels, and hospital course were studied. Results: PEP according to Cotton consensus criteria developed after 64 (2 %) of 3216 ERCPs over 3 years. Of the 64 patients with PEP, 14 underwent salvage ERCP (5 without and 9 with prior pancreatic stents, 7 of which had migrated outwards prematurely). All patients had SIRS and a high score (>= 3) for the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis. Median clinical onset of PEP was at 5 hours (range 0-68 hours) in patients with prophylactic pancreatic stents vs. 2 hours (range 0.5-2.5 hours) in patients without prophylactic pancreatic stents (P<0.05). Salvage ERCP was performed at a median of 10 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 2.4-22.7 hours). Improvement in pain, amylase, lipase, and resolution of SIRS were statistically significant at 24 hours after salvage ERCP (P=0.003). Median length of hospital stay was 2 days (IQR 1-4.75). No necrotizing pancreatitis or late complications occurred. Conclusion: Urgent salvage ERCP with de novo pancreatic stent placement or replacement of a migrated stent is a novel approach in the setting of early PEP, and was associated with rapid resolution of clinical pancreatitis and reduction in levels of amylase and lipase.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1091
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   5-Fr vs. 3-Fr pancreatic stents for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Afghani, Elham ;
Akshintala, Venkata S. ;
Khashab, Mouen A. ;
Law, Joanna K. ;
Hutfless, Susan M. ;
Kim, Katherine J. ;
Lennon, Anne Marie ;
Kalloo, Anthony N. ;
Singh, Vikesh K. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (07) :573-579
[2]   Rectal Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Are Superior to Pancreatic Duct Stents in Preventing Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Network Meta-analysis [J].
Akbar, Ali ;
Abu Dayyeh, Barham K. ;
Baron, Todd H. ;
Wang, Zhen ;
Altayar, Osama ;
Murad, Mohammad Hassan .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 11 (07) :778-783
[3]   Gabexate or somatostatin administration before ERCP in patients at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial [J].
Andriulli, A ;
Clemente, R ;
Solmi, L ;
Terruzzi, V ;
Suriani, R ;
Sigillito, A ;
Leandro, G ;
Leo, P ;
De Maio, G ;
Perri, F .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (04) :488-495
[4]   Pancreatic duct stents in the prophylaxis of pancreatic damage after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic analysis of benefits and associated risks [J].
Andriulli, Angelo ;
Forlano, Rosario ;
Napolitano, Grazia ;
Conoscitore, Pasquale ;
Caruso, Nazario ;
Pilotto, Alberto ;
Di Sebastiano, Pier Luigi ;
Leandro, Gioacchino .
DIGESTION, 2007, 75 (2-3) :156-163
[5]   Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus [J].
Banks, Peter A. ;
Bollen, Thomas L. ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Gooszen, Hein G. ;
Johnson, Colin D. ;
Sarr, Michael G. ;
Tsiotos, Gregory G. ;
Vege, Santhi Swaroop .
GUT, 2013, 62 (01) :102-111
[6]   A survey of physician practices on prophylactic pancreatic stents [J].
Brackbill, S ;
Young, S ;
Schoenfeld, P ;
Elta, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 64 (01) :45-51
[7]   Short 5Fr vs Long 3Fr Pancreatic Stents in Patients at Risk for Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis [J].
Chahal, Prabhleen ;
Tarnasky, Paul R. ;
Petersen, Bret T. ;
Topazian, Mark D. ;
Levy, Michael J. ;
Gostout, Christopher J. ;
Baron, Todd H. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 7 (08) :834-839
[8]   Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review [J].
Choudhary, Abhishek ;
Bechtold, Matthew L. ;
Arif, Murtaza ;
Szary, Nicholas M. ;
Puli, Srinivas R. ;
Othman, Mohamed O. ;
Pais, Wilson P. ;
Antillon, Mainor R. ;
Roy, Praveen K. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (02) :275-282
[9]   Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years [J].
Cotton, Peter B. ;
Garrow, Donald A. ;
Gallagher, Joseph ;
Romagnuolo, Joseph .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 70 (01) :80-88
[10]   Pancreatic-stent placement for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Das, Ananya ;
Singh, Pankaj ;
Sivak, Michael V., Jr. ;
Chak, Arnitabh .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (07) :960-968